Funny how you’re rebranding liberalism to meet your authoritarian goals…but yet have serious problem of my branding libs as fake liberals.
Again…altering the meaning of liberalism to suit your authoritarianism proves what I’ve been saying all along. Libs are hiding behind the very label of liberalism to promote their own authoritarianism.
Again you have no problem rebranding liberalism to suit your authoritarian. Is that one way street?
Libs are leftest…leftest are libs. They’re one and the same. It’s just some are still hiding behind the label of liberalism to promote their hardcore leftest agenda.
Funny how libs are still trying to manipulate the public that they’re liberals…or maybe they’re unable to accept that they have become who they claim to hate the most.
I kind of draw the line of not calling someone a liberal where people go through old books and try to get them removed from schools or stop publishing then because they don’t live up to their idea of how modern society should think.
Also, people who want non conforming Hollywood types removed from the industry…hard time seeing that as liberal. At one time liberals were against blacklisting…and it wasn’t just back in 1800.
Making up a lie about an election in order to overturn it is not merely contesting, it’s treason and you condone it. That puts your opinion of liberalism into doubt.
Again you have no problem rebranding liberalism to suit your authoritarian. Is that one way street?
I’m not rebranding liberalism, I’m using the same definition thats been used for the last 50 some years: modern liberalism combines ideas of civil liberty, equality, social justice, environmental protections, consumer protections and a market based mixed economy. Its asinine to call them authoritarian because to do so requires the baseline of what’s authoritarian to be lowered so much that it pretty much applies to anyone who supports seatbelt laws and telling companies not to dump sewage in our rivers.
Nope. “libs” is short for liberal and leftists are to the left of liberals…
“Hardcore leftist agenda” lol… If what the mainstream left supports is a “hardcore leftist agenda” then what the hell do you call seizing the means of production and nationalizing industries. It’s like calling anything heavier than a trickle and hurricane.
Or maybe you have no clue what you’re talking about because your unable to see outside of your right-wing narrative bubble.
This is not how the common person understands liberalism. Modern liberals support social justice so wanting to remove children’s books from schools because they include racist imagery is completely on brand.
That’s not a liberal thing, thats companies responding to angry potential consumers. Free market, baby.
Regardless whether or not you think the common person is an idiot or not, if you use the word liberal to describe someone most Americans will assume you mean modern liberalism and not classical.
Why are you taking out your frustration with most of America, that is, people who when they say or hear “liberal” think of modern liberalism, out on liberals?
I’m just calling out libs for warping the very definition of what liberalism means.
I understand why libs are doing it thou…they’re attempt to change the vision that this nation was built upon…and that vision was to prevent authoritarianism that we are witnessing from leftists/libs.
Most of the liberals who were around during the shift from liberal meaning classical to modern liberal are dead. Are you having a seance to call them out?
It’s not an active thing. Been this way for a long time.
From what I’ve read the transition from liberal commonly referring to classical liberalism to modern liberalism occurred during the first few decades of the 20th century. Do you have evidence that shows this to be false?
That’s always been my experience when I lived in densely populated areas. A couple of blocks in the wrong direction could always get randomly insane, and it didn’t really have anything to do with race. It was one of the biggest reasons I ended up escaping to the rural lands.
