I see gun grabbing libs suffered a big defeat today

[WuWei]

@biggestal99

States can write restrictions into law without violating the constitution.

That"s not.

[WuWei]

@coolidge

Kind of a shame we have people. In our country, who would rather restrict a law abiding citizen their right to defend one’s self. All the while allowing the criminal easier targets.

Or defend others…

Armed Washington state man shoots, kills attacker targeting neighbors, police...

[Tom_Ch]

@biggestal99

@Tom_Ch

SC ruling was 9-0. The liberal judges voted against provisions. Is that decry enough?

It was an easy case for SCOTUS.

No brainer.

Allan

Yup.nice to see consensus in SC.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@zantax

Odd, now all the liberals here are against red flag laws? Could have sworn they were all for them.

Maybe, but not this

[Mountain_Soldier]

@Supreme_War_Pig

@zantax

Odd, now all the liberals here are against red flag laws? Could have sworn they were all for them.

Maybe, but not this

Loosely written laws with very little protections for due process, very lax requirements to get a red flag order, judges rubber stamping requests, no punishments for false reports, hell to get weapons back (attorneys required)…. What could possibly go wrong with any of that?

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@Mountain_Soldier

@Supreme_War_Pig

@zantax

Odd, now all the liberals here are against red flag laws? Could have sworn they were all for them.

Maybe, but not this

Loosely written laws with very little protections for due process, very lax requirements to get a red flag order, judges rubber stamping requests, no punishments for false reports, hell to get weapons back (attorneys required)…. What could possibly go wrong with any of that?

Which state’s law are you describing?

[Mountain_Soldier]

@Supreme_War_Pig

@Mountain_Soldier

@Supreme_War_Pig

@zantax

Odd, now all the liberals here are against red flag laws? Could have sworn they were all for them.

Maybe, but not this

Loosely written laws with very little protections for due process, very lax requirements to get a red flag order, judges rubber stamping requests, no punishments for false reports, hell to get weapons back (attorneys required)…. What could possibly go wrong with any of that?

Which state’s law are you describing?

Pretty much all of them.

[W_and_C]

Honest question - you know many liberals who champion warrantless entry and seizure of property ?

[Mountain_Soldier]

@W_and_C

Honest question - you know many liberals who champion warrantless entry and seizure of property ?

When it comes to firearms? Absolutely. Look at any gun banner.

Feinstein in 1995: 'Mr. and Mrs. America, Turn Them All In'

[W_and_C]

@Mountain_Soldier

@W_and_C

Honest question - you know many liberals who champion warrantless entry and seizure of property ?

When it comes to firearms? Absolutely. Look at any gun banner.

Feinstein in 1995: 'Mr. and Mrs. America, Turn Them All In' - YouTube

Where does she talk about warrantless entry ?

[Mountain_Soldier]

Turn ‘em all in… or else.

[W_and_C]

@Mountain_Soldier

Turn ‘em all in… or else.

Still nothing about warrantless. That’s what the SCOTUS case was about

[Samm]

@biggestal99

@WuWei

So is the right to keep and bear arms

As long as they abide by states restrictions.

Any non criminal, adult who is of sound mind can bear arms in jersey.

Sort of.

[Samm]

@Supreme_War_Pig

@zantax

Odd, now all the liberals here are against red flag laws? Could have sworn they were all for them.

Maybe, but not this

Perhaps you could clarify for us how this situation differs from red flag laws?

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@Samm

@Supreme_War_Pig

@zantax

Odd, now all the liberals here are against red flag laws? Could have sworn they were all for them.

Maybe, but not this

Perhaps you could clarify for us how this situation differs from red flag laws?

It doesn’t.

This is a red flag laws, but not all red flag laws are this.

And if they are, they are done

[Mountain_Soldier]

@Supreme_War_Pig

@Samm

@Supreme_War_Pig

@zantax

Odd, now all the liberals here are against red flag laws? Could have sworn they were all for them.

Maybe, but not this

Perhaps you could clarify for us how this situation differs from red flag laws?

It doesn’t.

This is a red flag laws, but not all red flag laws are this.

And if they are, they are done

Very little oversight on any of them. So easy to get a red flag order… I haven’t found a single instance of someone being prosecuted for filing a false red flag order.

[PurpnGold]

@Mountain_Soldier

Very little oversight on any of them. So easy to get a red flag order… I haven’t found a single instance of someone being prosecuted for filing a false red flag order.

Can you show us libs where we want warrantless home entry?

[Mountain_Soldier]

@PurpnGold

@Mountain_Soldier

Very little oversight on any of them. So easy to get a red flag order… I haven’t found a single instance of someone being prosecuted for filing a false red flag order.

Can you show us libs where we want warrantless home entry?

“Wellness checks”. Blank check to go into someone’s house and ensure they can’t hurt themselves or others. Liberals are for that, right?

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@Mountain_Soldier

“Wellness checks”. Blank check to go into someone’s house and ensure they can’t hurt themselves or others. Liberals are for that, right?

“Wellness checks” are in no way synonymous with warrantless entry of a home.

[PurpnGold]

@Mountain_Soldier

“Wellness checks”. Blank check to go into someone’s house and ensure they can’t hurt themselves or others. Liberals are for that, right?

Why do you think libs want warrantless home entry?