Bad rhode island. Bad
Like they’d know what “properly” looks like.
2 Likes
I’m liberal and just finished my 6.5 Grendel 12 inch arp 
gun, the 80% lower for both my arp and Glock were a joke to make.
Gun control that libs push is pointless feel good ■■■■■■■■■
I agree with SCOTUS
How would safe storage laws even be enforced, without entering someone’s residence? Is it an add-on like a hate crime?
Well according to the OP… the issue was warrantless entry to seize guns. If that is the simplified version of what SCOTUS ruled on… then I agree with SCOTUS
But I’m trusting that @conan representation in the OP was accurate
SC ruling was 9-0. The liberal judges voted against provisions. Is that decry enough?
Perhaps, but the court shot it down, and I agree
Properly as defined in the law. Now whether the lawmakers know what’s proper or not is another question.
According to Nancy and company…yes.
Clearly stated in the constitution.
Get a warrant.
Allan
It was an easy case for SCOTUS.
No brainer.
Allan
So is the right to keep and bear arms.
2 Likes
Odd, now all the liberals here are against red flag laws? Could have sworn they were all for them.
10 Likes
As long as they abide by states restrictions.
Any non criminal, adult who is of sound mind can bear arms in jersey.
Allan
That is not in the Constitution. You should read it sometime.
3 Likes
And you would be wrong.
Obviously with a unanimous opinion that is not the case.
States have to write constitutional laws, or get them tossed in SCOTUS.
Warrantless searches are a no no in this country.
Allan
Once again, the constitution is interrupted by SCOTUS.
States can write restrictions into law without violating the constitution.
If you think a law is violating the constitution bring it to court as in this case.
Allan
Kind of a shame we have people. In our country, who would rather restrict a law abiding citizen their right to defend one’s self. All the while allowing the criminal easier targets.
7 Likes
Well…that’s a true statement.
