It’s easy to look back now and ask why, but it was still unfolding. He did ask the Republican Congressional leadership about it and THEY said keep it quiet. And if he had said something, you know that Trump and all his supporters (and Fox News) would have accused him of campaigning for Hillary or being a fearmonger. I’m waiting to see what he’ll say in his upcoming book, though I do believe he should have told the R’s to shove it. He did it a couple of times. Why not now?
1 Like
Hillary explained it very well and her comments remain true today
1 Like
Why does the OP and other Trump supporters think that telling the campaigns would have made some sort of difference. And can you imagine telling Trump and asking him to keep it quiet so the investigation could continue. Uncle Blabby would be out singing immediately.
Uncle Blabby! I like that.
But I think, since his last medical exam, we are good to call him Uncle Flabby Blabby!
It’s a special skill to ask the same question over and over and be obtusely, intentionally deaf to the actual answer. The tactic depends on willful ignorance of both the utterer and the audience.
That’s why it works so well with Trump supporters.
Once again Donald calls Russian interference a “big hoax.”
Poor fool simply cannot help himself. Grabbing his rabid base by the ■■■■■ is the only succor he has left in these hard times.
So he’s back to calling it a “hoax”. Not sure how many times he’s flip flopped on this.
And anyway… why is he so mad that Obama didn’t do anything about this “hoax”?
1 Like
Because obama is a feckless ■■■■ cuck.
And it’s all a hoax, so there’s that.
“critical national infrastructure” ring any bells?
Here’s a post from a week ago I don’t care to retype:
https://community.hannity.com/t/why-is-president-trump-not-a-treasonous-traitor/7407/557?u=hwyflier
In 24 hours you’ve posted twice about gimps and once about cucking. It’s like your search history is leaking .
Make that 4 for the pattern.
So is it a hoax or did it happen. Which is it.
So Obama is feckless for not standing up to the Russian meddling…
…that happens to all be a hoax? wut.
1 Like
^This.
10char
1 Like
Pretty sure Obama started a counterintelligence investigation headed by Jim Comey, and then Trump fired Comey because he thought it would stop the investigation.
Obama approached Mitch McConnel and said they should make a bipartisan statement so that it would not look political. He wanted to share with teh country what they knew - but at the time, they didn’t know exactly who - only that the hacks were russian in origin. They didn’t have enough information to indict anyone. But even if they did, without a bipartisan recognition of the facts, t would be perceived as obama using the power of the government to influence the election.
Mitch McConnel told Obama to go ■■■■ in his hat.
So Obama said nothing.
Obama should have come down on the Russians for a hoax? Is that your final answer?
I like Benedict Donald. 
2 Likes
Benedict Donald.
That is a good one!
Why hasn’t Mitch McConnell had to answer for this? I’d love to hear him defend this.
