Then look them up yourself and get an education.
You haven’t shown what Mexico’s level is.
I did. Where’s your hard data on Mexico?
You provided a link to a single incident.
The U.S. ranks close to the top, while Mexico ranks close to the bottom.
US corruption is much more creative than Mexican production.
With cops here, it’s based on who you know and who your family is.
With Mexico, it’s all about money.
1 Like
Why do police in the US need to be corrupt when they can just use civil asset forfeiture and take stuff without doing anything in return?
2 Likes
So naive.
Well, that was a productive discussion. 
Used to be a popular bumper sticker out there.
“When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns”.
Libs refuse to see that criminals will get guns by all sorts of illegal methods.
Only law abiding citizens would give up their guns.
2 Likes
Not entirely. It’s also about “take the money or we’ll kill your family.”
In Colombia it was called “plata o plomo”
Money or lead.
I suspect most of them took the money considering how psychotic guys like Escobar or The Castanzo brother were.
I don’t know about “most”, I doubt it. A lot of them died. A lot of them fought back.
That’s a rough way to go. The Narcos killed you real bad. It wasn’t pretty.
Mostly just shooting. The problem was they targeted families as well.
That’s probably the worst part of it.
The 60 Minutes story was more about how if you don’t or can’t control your borders; gun control is useless. Currently drugs go north and guns go south via straw purchases which was why Mexico is sueing gun makers and selected gun shops using the Purdue Pharma/Opoids theory of responsibility. No idea how the courts will see that.
Assuming that stands up in court couldn’t we sue the Mexican state over Fent and Meth entering the US in large numbers?
No. That’s wrong.
Gun manufacturers have nothing to do with gun purchases.
1 Like
That’s why they turned to threatening families instead. They get far better cooperation.
