How many people will die as result of biased coverage of the Chauvin trial?

That. Is. Not. How. Overdoses. Work.

For the fiftieth time.

1 Like

And oh yeah, if Chauvin was aware Floyd was on opiates and still used that move, that makes it worse, not better. Every first responder knows that alcohol and opiates can suppress your breathing reflex and make strangleholds and the like much more dangerous.

The more likely scenario is she’ll be invited to the White House.

The drug dealer can use your expert opinion to prevent any prosecution for the high level of fentanyl in Floyd’s bloodstream so the judge can turn down his lawyer’s fifth-amendment argument.

Yes.

I think recent events have shown new and innovative ways for police to handle protests that start to turn violent. For example suppose an unarmed protestor enters a building through a broken window. Past approaches would be to provide instructions to leave or to arrest for trespassing, possibly with the use of restraints if there is resistance.

The Capitol Police have demonstrated that warnings, arrests, and restraints are not required. Police officers can simply wait in an obscure corner and shoot the first person through a broken window. No need to render any aid for the trespasser after the shooting.

There will be no real investigation and congress and the media will applaud while the identity of the police officer involved will remain a state secret. Anyone who protests the shooting is likely to have visit from the FBI with a possible trip to a federal prison to be held without trial.

When can the Capitol Police start classes for the police in Minneapolis on the new techniques they have developed? Or are they only for use in the Capitol against unarmed protestors with MAGA hats?

For background here is a graphic video of the Capitol shooting demonstrating the innovative technique:

2 Likes

Well for one thing that is not a logical step at all. Do you really believe that Democrats today are that barbaric?

As mentioned earlier, MSNBC has already called it a MURDER.

Of course there will be looting, burning, rioting, violence, and destruction if “MURDER” goes unpunished. That is how MSM works… twisting the weak minded to believe what MSM wants them to believe.

Did MSNBC get advanced notice of a jury decision? They refer to George Floyd’s “Murder” . So the jury decided it was in fact “Murder”? Or are they writing to persuade thugs and leftists to burn, loot, and destroy.

So you see @GrandWazoo the deception that MSNBC is using now or are you still saying they are just and honest?

In the MSNBC clip that you cited never does he refer to it as murder. He starts by saying that; “For the past week we have watched the trial of Derek Chauvin and the killing of George Floyd”.

In bold font, the title says “George Floyd’s Murder”.

Nice try. Not really. Pathetic actually.

This title?

Chauvin trial for George Floyd’s murder reflects Black America’s pain Capehart says in this week’s ‘Bye Line’

If that is the title you are speaking about, what is wrong with it? Is this not a murder trial?

Lol even homicide still means killed by a person.

No. That’s not how an injected OD on it works. You’re right. We have been over this.

And the point was why was he begging for his life and saying he couldn’t breath before getting taken to the ground. What was the reason?

Every bit.

For proof I present the border crisis human catastrophe.

And that was after Chauvin was arrested. They are not willing to let the legal process play out, they just want to burn things down on principle. If Chauvin is found guilty of anything less than first degree murder, there will be riots. And if found guilty of first degree murder, they will riot if he is sentenced to less than life. As I said earlier, they are not interested in justice, all they want is revenge.

It is if your actions are what you are predicting.

Why do you keep saying asphyxiated? The ME’s report makes no such claim.

He is not being tried for first degree murder.

And why do you keep saying “you guys” when addressing one person?

Yes, but it does not mean murder.