Seems like this Federal officer is deep into some anti Semitism, the blood libel of Democrats in their cannibal / pedo ring drinking the blood of kids to stay young.
Youâre getting those replies due to the disingenuous nature of yours. You are acting both an authority of antisemitism in 1 post then acting as if you donât know well established facts in the next. Itâs extremely transparent and a lazy form of debating
And by so saying you condemn yourself as disingenuous, because you are claiming that what you know is well established in one post, but are acting as if you donât know anything of those allleged facts by not being able to articulate them in another post.
The Protocols has gone through several revisions but has always had the same theme, that Jews and Freemasons were concocting an international plot to control banking and the press to subvert Christianity.
Hitler was a big fan, as was Henry Ford who Americanized it in âThe Intetnarional Jewâ, Americaâs first AM radio star Father Coughlin didnât actually quite endorse it but sure cribbed heavily from âProtocolsâ, and then up the The John Birch Society and today we see it in the SOROS!!!1! frenzies from some places.
All of a theme and all of them from Protocols. Itâs made a comeback as well, with this ad from â16 with Clinton in league with the Jewish Fed chair, the Jewish financier, and the Jewish CEO of Goldman Sachs.
And then this year youâve had the âBernie Sanders Jewish Puppet Masterâ ads from the Trump campaign.
These arenât any accident. They know what theyâre saying.
These are all easily researchable and I donât find your questions to be made in good faith.
âProtocolsâ is wildly anti Semetic. In many ways itâs been cleaned up but the attacks on the âliberal mediaâ and academia are in the same vein.
âLiberal media biasâ is a political strategy devised by then Nixon speech writer Pat Buchanan and Edith Efron. Nixonâs anti Semitism is well known as is Buchananâs. During Watergate they couldnât come right out and say âJew controlled mediaâ as a way to blunt Watergate reporting so they came up with âliberal mediaâ. Two sides of the same coin.
You asked for examples then then when provided them pretended to not understand what they meant. You are either being disingenuous or are simply uniformed about antisemitism. You can not both claim to understand the issue and be oblivious at the same time
Define anti-semitism. Is it denigrating people merely for being Semitic? Is it denigrating a political or economic agenda of any group who just happen to be Semitic? What do you think anti-Semitic means? And how does âthe Elders of Zionâ narrative fit your definition?
They shouldnât reward them with any money to rebuild sections of cities burned out by rioters (BLM< ANTIFA) while their dem leaders gave a wink and a nod and refused to stop it.