Here we go again... election integrity

just follow the law

6 Likes

What could possibly go wrong??

6 Likes

Oh look, they don’t want to follow election laws, again.

:man_shrugging:

7 Likes

What in the hell could possibly be gained in doing this for the purpose of election integrity? In even suggesting that it’s for the safety and health of the voter, is pure poop. There is only one purpose and it’s a fraudulent one. Let us all unite in desiring election integrity and let’s stop these political establishment turds from working against it.

4 Likes

Having to document a ballot is legal unfairly suppresses Democrat votes.

5 Likes

Another mail order election.

2 Likes

What percentage of the states somehow get by with no witness signature?

What percentage of states do Virginia election laws apply to?

6 Likes

Virginia election laws would apply to 2 percent of all the states.

1 Like

It was a rhetorical question in response to a pointless question.

2 Likes

wait. are we three days away from a presidential election already??

well this isn’t proof of fraud at all! lol

New poll showing a statistical tie, gotta fix that somehow.

3 Likes

Yes - very pointless when discussing changing one state’s stupid requirement to note that 92% of the country gets by without said stupid requirement.

and is… um… oh, racist!

If they ain’t cheatin’, they ain’t tryin’. :wink:

4 Likes

oh sorry i thought that said supreme court judicial kneejerk panic decision

this is NOT FRAUD

< bangs shoe on podium >

why dont you want people voting??

Yes, pointless.
Stupid requirement, debatable.