Try reading our constitution and see if you can get an idea.
Are you saying that the USA constitution is a higher authority than the bible?
Under US law it certainly does.
An interesting point of view. I await with much anticipation responses to that post.
It’s not an opinion or point of view it’s objective fact.
I’m a guy and I’ll say that most of my “deviant” likes were first tried because the women told me what they wanted and basically demanded I try things.
I was introduced to “stuff” by the women I’ve dated. I’m an open minded person so I’ll try just about anything once but woo… some of the women I’ve dated lol. Sex addicts with crazy fetishes.
I will add that it’s a personal anecdote and everyone has different experiences. In a lot of cases men pressure women to try things. But from my own personal experiences most of the things I’ve tried were the ideas of the women I’ve been committed to.
2 Likes
As for homosexuality I really don’t care. Be who you are and love who you love. I don’t have an opinion on it one way or the other. I literally couldn’t care less, although I strongly support the civil rights and equality of homosexuals and always have.
Apart from their ridiculous (and hazardous) decision to ignore God’s expressed commands i.e. “judge not”, “I will repay”, “cast the first stone”, and usurp His power of judgement, the baffling question is: why do these people care so much about this? What is it about this “sin” that makes them so rigid and prideful, yet so willing to overlook adultery, greed, bearing false witness? All these are explicitly condemned in scripture, but Forrest gets a pass because “policies”.
It can’t just be the easily triggered gag reflex. How does this impact their lives in the slightest?
1 Like
How so?
Which part?
The entire constitution.
The old “when asked for specifics, wave hands aimlessly in the air and declare 'I don’t owe you an explanation!”
That is specific. His questions were general and thus the answer cannot be simplistic.
If you don’t have a basic overview of our constitution it’s pretty difficult to have anything resembling and in depth two way discussion.
And your choice to ignore my pointing out that God is watching is noted.
Cite the post.
Your invocation of the Constitution immediately followed @westaussie’s question about ignoring divorce. If you were actually replying to another post further up, isn’t it customary (and polite) to hit “reply” for the benefit of those playing along at home?
If you don’t even read the posts you’ll always have difficulty following the conversation.
If you don’t wait at least 10 seconds before posting again, you’re gonna flat out miss large parts of the conversation.
So you WERE replying to @westaussie. Good to know. Where is divorce referenced in the Constitution?
Under freedom of association.
1 Like