Greenhouse Gases Are Not Dangerous

[gooddad409]

@Striker840

@Imel

No you are talking about doing away with green energy which is natural using wind and solar.
You want man made energy and plastic (we all do) and thats the problem.

So called “green energy” is far worse for the environment than using current means. The mining of the materials required alone is destroying huge swaths of land, the solar panels and windmill blades are not recycable amd are just buried. Along with that solar farms take up huge swaths of farmland thus making that land unavailable for farming.

Wow, you are beyond…forget it, not worth eating a ban if I said what I really want to say.

Green energy cannot keep up with demand.

Libs refuse to acknowledge that.

You need Coal or Natural gas powered plants or nuclear to make up the difference between green energy and demand.

[Striker840]

@Imel

And there it is the male arrogance of sweetheart you are sooo predictable if nothing else. I bow to your male superiority…not.
Sorry you ■■■■■■ us all up with your ■■■■■■■ ego.

Oh honey, calm down

[Striker840]

@SixFoot

@Imel

I dont appreciate the condensation.

Then you would die in the South.

Oh honey, bless your heart!!!

[Striker840]

@Imel

Yeah must be me the only possible answer.

Well…you ARE the common denominator in the equation.

And my wife AND daughters would eat you alive.

[TheRedComet]

The only true green energy that works in all situations for every use case is nuclear. Every other “green” energy production method is very situational at best. Like don’t get me wrong I like solar. But it comes with some important caveats that people don’t think about when they scream “just switch 100% to solar.”

[Samm]

@Imel

No believe me there would only be one winner and it ain’t you southern softies.
Fighting Irish and all that you wouldn’t be able to cope.

Melting down in the condensation.

[Samm]

@Imel

I like men who think I’m equal to them at the very least just basic human standards.
If you think you’re better than me well no.

Interpretation: I like men who I can control.

[Samm]

@Guvnah

@Samm

I beg to differ … ALL vegetarians fart.

Get your sarcasm meter updated.

Ditto.

[Samm]

@Imel

No man made not natural get it.
If natural man wouldn’t have any part.
Man interferes = not natural.

Such an adamant display of ignorance is not helping your case.

[Samm]

@Imel

So should I just be quiet while you continue to post about last word stuff.

Of course not. But educate yourself before you speak.

[Samm]

@Imel

Why am I a man hater yet no man has been accused of being a woman hater.

What an odd thing to say.

[Samm]

@Imel

Aren’t you against wind and solar though all natural.

Nobody I know is against using wind or solar power.

But where do they grow those natural wind generators and solar panels?

Their fuel is natural, just like oil and methane gas are natural. That’s the problem with the environmental movement. You only look at the end product and not how you got there.

“Why do we need a smoke belching power plant, you can just plug into that outlet on the wall.”

[Samm]

@Imel

They are infinite fossil fuel is not. Trump is against green energy.

You have no idea what resources it takes to create “green” power, do you.

[Samm]

@7426k

I disagree. In fact, I might suggest the opposite is true - that women are driven by reason and men are driven by emotion.

Maybe you missed that I am yanking her chain.

But I am concerned that your suggestion here appears to be serious.

[Samm]

@Imel

I haven’t once denigrated men unlike said men

You are right … not once have you denigrated men. Pretty much everything you have said regarding men has been denigrating.

[7426k]

Sometimes my dry humor is too dry :))

My response wasn’t meant any more seriously than your post.

[TheRedComet]

Only true green energy is nuclear and even then it’s not completely clean during construction of the reactor and the plant. Every other “green” production method requires even more fossil fuels than nuclear does.

[Samm]

@tnt

@e7alr

News flash, we are a part of natural composition of this planet. Our activities are just part of the nature of this planet. The species self-loathing of some individuals never ceases to amaze me.

What a weird thing to say.

It’s simply a fact that since humans industrialized, we have contributed higher levels of methane and co2 and CFCs and particulate pollution to the atmosphere. And these higher levels have an effect on our ecosystem.

You think we banned CFCs because people hate our species? Quite the opposite…without an ozone layer, we’d fry into extinction…

More animals (humans, for example) produce more methane and CO2 because both are natural waste products of physiology. And part of staying alive and thriving (for humans) is to convert natural carbonaceous minerals and biomass that produce free methane and CO2 when oxidized, into energy or digested. And growing and consuming and disposing of unused portions of carbon-based plants and animals produces more methane and CO2. It’s all very natural.

The thread is about deregulation of a natural compound, specifically carbon dioxide, that is essential to life on the planet. CFCs are neither natural nor essential.

Particulate matter in the atmosphere, while generally bad for any air-breathing organism, actually blocks and reflects sunlight and cools the planet (think volcanic eruptions.) For instance, back in the 70s, when LA cleaned up their ozone/nitrous oxide/smog problem, the average annual air temperature rose about 3 degrees due to increased insolation at the surface.

[Samm]

@SixFoot

@e7alr

News flash, we are a part of natural composition of this planet. Our activities are just part of the nature of this planet. The species self-loathing of some individuals never ceases to amaze me.

We are literally the personification of Nature itself.

The most prolifically successful mammal on the planet … well, except maybe for rats.

[Samm]

@tnt

The US banning CFCs is an example of us recognizing made made gases being introduced into the atmosphere, raising it to unnatural levels, has a detrimental effect on our biosphere, resulting in political action to reverse the negative effects.

That’s all.

All correct, but completely immaterial to the topic of the thread.