Greenhouse Gases Are Not Dangerous

What a weird thing to say.

It’s simply a fact that since humans industrialized, we have contributed higher levels of methane and co2 and CFCs and particulate pollution to the atmosphere. And these higher levels have an effect on our ecosystem.

You think we banned CFCs because people hate our species? Quite the opposite…without an ozone layer, we’d fry into extinction…

We are literally the personification of Nature itself.

Oh good, the U.S. isn’t a significant source of CFC pollution, so that whole emotional argument is moot.

1 Like

It is only weird if you are generally self unaware, with a simplistic, naive concept of reality.

This is delicious. :rofl:

3 Likes

huh.

Well, if you don’t want to just acknowledge the simple reality of it, I guess that’s up to you.

This whole thing has been most amusing. :joy:

1 Like

The US banning CFCs is an example of us recognizing made made gases being introduced into the atmosphere, raising it to unnatural levels, has a detrimental effect on our biosphere, resulting in political action to reverse the negative effects.

That’s all.

Looks like the U.S. has no intention of polluting with CFC’s anymore, so when you folks hear a loony lib ranting on about CFC’s, it’s clear that they have no education on the matter.

5 Likes

You’d better.

1 Like

We found alternatives to their use. That’s when they were banned.

There’s a middle ground here with all this.

Done after we found alternatives.

The issue with the environut crowd is that they just want to stop human activity entirely without finding alternatives first.

The world agreed to phase then out completely by 2010 in 1987, leading to research for alternatives.

We agreed to phase them out. Then we found alternatives, then we banned them completely.

If we didn’t we’d all be orange like trump.

But anyway, folks, if it’s warming the Earf, you should all be thankful that your food will grow another year.

think-about-it-498-x-418-gif-wvybbfu4510eiu8m

2 Likes

And right there we see what you are actually against.

Your hatred demands that if Trump approves you must disapprove.

It’s not any more complex than that.

2 Likes

Ok, you HAVE to be trolling, NOBODY is this freaking stupid!!

4 Likes

There is no middle ground period in todays politics. Just leave it at that.

So called “green energy” is far worse for the environment than using current means. The mining of the materials required alone is destroying huge swaths of land, the solar panels and windmill blades are not recycable amd are just buried. Along with that solar farms take up huge swaths of farmland thus making that land unavailable for farming.

Wow, you are beyond…forget it, not worth eating a ban if I said what I really want to say.

2 Likes

I think this is the middle ground, well the first step toward gettong there. Every single regulation the EPA ever enacted COULD have been a written law.

Nothing in what Trump is doing here prevents such laws from being enacted.

The point here is that unelected bureacrats should ot be given te power to enact such sweeping and powerful regulations by diktat. Once a measure passes a certain threshold of power, it should be the stuff of law because the American people deserve the ability to un-elect the people behind laws we don’t like.

1 Like