61

They already have evidence. They charged based on the evidence they had.

Now they have more evidence. They can submit that evidence into the record

62

No.

Good to see you my friend.

63

Mind boggling concept

64

What evidence is that?

65

I say let Bolton testify on the limited subject of what he has already said in the book, impeach Bolton on the basis of his leaking right before his book came out, and then make the argument that even if Trump did say he did not want to give the money unless they investigated Biden, that would still not be impeachable.
Then vote.

66

Impeach Bolton?

Come again?

67

As with all things Politifact, it depends on which truth they want to answer. If the question had been did then Senator Biden want to allow new witnesses in the Clinton impeachment trial they would have had to answer with this:

“I think it would be absolutely unfair, contrary to any notion of due process if now, after all the time the House spent, all this voluminous record, they said, ‘By the way, there is Jane Doe or Charlie Doe out there. We never spoke to them. No one has – they weren’t before the House. They weren’t in the House record. We want to call them now,'”

68

"Impeachment"has more than one meaning.
Dictionary will help.

69

Ill say it again.

We all know that Trump would not let cabinet members testify to the House because he is terrified of the truth. By asserting executive privilege, he hopes that would lead to a prolonged court battle that could easily run out the clock till after the November election.

70

Say when Holder refused to testify he was scare of truth to come out?

Or is that only with people you disagree with?

71

Can you name all the other Senate trials that had no witnesses?

72

Bolton’s Manuscript
Emails released by FOIA requests
The legal determination on the legality of withholding aid

73

How do you put politics on trial?

74

Bolton didn’t leak anything

75

Hey the Senate can even ask him under oath if he leaked. That should solve that puzzle. The dude likely doesn’t want to go to jail.

76

???

77

:man_shrugging:

78

Talking cats and qanon

79

He never exerted executive priveldge.

Besides, didn’t the Democrats proclaim how saddened, somber and prayerful they were over having to do this? Wasn’t it a matter of truth, justice and the American way? Didn’t they say it was a clear violation of the Constitution??? Didn’t they say it had NOTHING to do with the election??? Wasn’t it urgent due to national security???

What a bunch of ■■■■■■■■■

80

Ummm…come on man.

“A growing number of Republicans are pointing to President Donald Trump’s threat to invoke executive privilege in order to make their case against subpoenas sought by Democrats for key witnesses and documents, a development that could bolster Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s goal of a swift end to the impeachment trial.”