Going forward, Is it ok…?

[Scratch]

@Piper

Harassment is governed by state laws, which vary by state, but is generally defined as a course of conduct which annoys, threatens, intimidates, alarms puts a person in fear of their safety

You mean like the Trayvon Martin and Zimmermon case? That situation fits the definition of harassment. By that definition Zimmerman was harrasing Martin.

[Guvnah]

@Mountain_Soldier

To disrupt dinner, plans with families, anything… because someone didn’t vote on an issue the way you wanted or is a member of the wrong party?

As evidenced by Sarah Sanders, now Kavanaugh…. Is this acceptable? Is this how it’s going to be going forward?

Don’t worry. Media tell us those were peaceful protests.

[SixFoot]

It’s (D)ifferent when (D)omestic terrorists do it.

[Guvnah]

@TommyLucchese

It sounds like you’re saying they need a buffer zone around them to recent harassment but unfortunately the people who need those buffer zones have ruled that sidewalks are a public thoroughfare and it is unconstitutional to prevent free speech on them. I assumed you were an originalist who agreed with them.

That’s the actual definition of irony.

Your post is a great example of stupidity.

None of those mentioned who were harassed were on a sidewalk.

[Scratch]

Or when (R)ight to Life(R)'s do it…

[WuWei]

You should sit this one out.

[SixFoot]

Always the same triggered ra(D)icals.

[Guvnah]

@SixFoot

It’s (D)ifferent when (D)omestic terrorists do it.

The lib (D)uplicity seems extra thick today.

[WuWei]

@sikofit

@GWH

Lol. Cyberbullying by parents. In other words, parents refusing to let certain teachers overstep their bounds.

No.In other words harassment of private citizens

No it isn’t.

[Scratch]

Uses the term Domestic terrorist…and calls someone else triggered…

[SixFoot]

@Guvnah

@SixFoot

It’s (D)ifferent when (D)omestic terrorists do it.

The lib (D)uplicity seems extra thick today.

(D)rones do what programming (D)oes.

[SixFoot]

Back to the ankle biting already?

[Jezcoe]

@Mountain_Soldier

@Jezcoe

@Mountain_Soldier

@Jezcoe

@Mountain_Soldier

Except for the need to know what firearms I own and/or want to buy.

I don’t care how many firearms you own.

I just think that there should be licensure and mandatory training.

That has nothing to do with what type or how many firearms you have.

Licensure ensures the government knows how many and what types of firearms I own. Then the AG can leak that information freely to everyone.

There is nothing about privacy in anything you typed.

No it doesn’t.

I hunting license doesn’t reveal how many guns you own… so a firearms license would not necessarily reveal that either.

The truth of the matter is that most gun deaths are from suicide and accidents. Mass shootings are big and flashy… but they are a small amount of overall deaths.

IMO by having licensure and mandatory training that will cut into the number of gun deaths with little imposition on gun owners.

I don’t want to derail, but what training would I need that the Army didn’t provide?

I would have no problem with having army training as a legitimate waiver

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

I would have no problem with having army training as a legitimate waiver

Stop.

Who cares what you have a problem with?

[sikofit]

@WuWei

@sikofit

@GWH

Lol. Cyberbullying by parents. In other words, parents refusing to let certain teachers overstep their bounds.

No.In other words harassment of private citizens

No it isn’t.

Teachers aren’t private citizens?

[WuWei]

@sikofit

@WuWei

@sikofit

@GWH

Lol. Cyberbullying by parents. In other words, parents refusing to let certain teachers overstep their bounds.

No.In other words harassment of private citizens

No it isn’t.

Teachers aren’t private citizens?

Public employees.

[GWH]

@sikofit

@GWH

Lol. Cyberbullying by parents. In other words, parents refusing to let certain teachers overstep their bounds.

No.In other words harassment of private citizens

Yes, the students.

[Roxiebelle]

It’s okay as long as Democrats are in power who support lawlessness, rudeness, harassment, intimidation & cheating as long as it’s to their benefit. Protestors outside SC Justices homes broke the law & are still breaking the law with impunity. Bidens DOJ is doing nothing about it and could care less about the wellbeing of a conservative judge.

The only way to restore law & order and the civil society in this country is to not vote for a Democrat. There is precious few ethical DC pols and bureaucrats, and none are Democrats.

[DougBH]

@Piper

@Supreme_War_Pig

Nonsense. The decision is already released, there is no intent to influence.

They were protesting way before they gave their ruling.

If there is no intent to influence in performance of a judges duty, what is the point of the harassment? Obviously the judges will be making rulings in similar types of cases. This lets Kavanaugh….all judges…know what awaits them if they make the non woke choice.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@DougBH

If there is no intent to influence in performance of a judges duty, what is the point of the harassment?

You mis-spelled “protest”

Which also happens to be the answer to your question.