He wasn’t an illegal or a minority.
We would still be waiting otherwise.
3 Likes
Of course.
All the while ignoring massive crime from illegals going on!
5 Likes
For all of the gun grabbers. How does this make sense? Saving lives by killing a mass murderer gets you arrested.
2 Likes
May be why the Dad has hired an expensive lawyer.
1 Like
I don’t know of any liberal who was against uniformed armed trained officers at schools. What we didn’t like was the idea of teachers having guns, random “good guys” being on campuses armed. I was literally on a jury for an assault charge of two dads fighting at a school while dropping off their kids. They were both horrible ■■■■■■■■■ and if one or both had been armed…I think it would have made the news.
Teachers tend to be far more intelligent than cops.
1 Like
Which doesn’t mean ■■■■ for decision making with a gun.
What’s with your appeal to intelligence for every scenario except what they are actually intelligent in. Seems like you would trust Fauci with a gun but not a vaccine 
because he’s “intelligent”.
1 Like
That’s not how that works.
Also bearing arms. Not just owning them.
2 Likes
Besides, the original question about this red herring asked about accidents. Not criminal acts.
But you’re right. Insurance covers losses from criminal acts if the insured is not the one doing the crime. Look at all the looting examples out there. A common lib dismissal of those crimes is that the looted store is covered by insurance. And they are.
2 Likes
Actually WE were not. YOU were.
2 Likes
It’s where I think this will go too. The guy will plead to get the murder charges dropped.
2 Likes
And gave that maniac access either with keys or the combination. That “locked safe” you mentioned wasn’t secure, the killer still had access.
Hmmmm
2 Likes
major deflection alert.
why are we still talking about a mass shooting by a white citizen minor person when we have brown immigrants on a massive crime wave of epic proportions.
Allan
Hanoman said Nancy Lanza told him she introduced guns to Adam as a way to teach him responsibility. ‘Guns require a lot of respect, and she really tried to instill that responsibility within him, and he took to it. He loved being careful with them. He made it a source of pride,’ Hanoman said."
It’s interesting
1 Like
seems like the FBI visited the family about online threats to shoot up a school before daddy even bought the gun for the child…
the child complained about being picked on by the other students… school can’t do anything about that…
Jeremy was here
They’re not wrong. With a normal mentally sane person introducing them to firearms can teach and build enormous respect and foster a sense of enormous responsibility, both for other people and for themselves.
Thing is… this kid apparently had shown he was already ■■■■■■ three times in the head. Giving him a gun was a terrible idea.
2 Likes
I don’t disagree but I am guessing you touched your first gun at what age like 10?11? Get introduced i mean. I don’t think they knew that back then.
