I’m sorry. Can you show me where registering to vote as has been done for the past 50 years is disenfranchisement? How did you manage to pull it off if it’s so freaking impossible?
Five years isn’t that long considering many people never vote in the midterms. Five years could be sitting out one presidential election. I’m not sure if that is enough to signal a lack of desire to vote permanently.
I agree with all of this 100%. 1,000%. We have all these battles about registration, when the obvious solution is to just do away with it entirely. Of course my side would have to give way on the I.D. requirements, but I am okay with that.
The idea should be to make it easy to vote, not harder.
I haven’t looked at the 39 replies yet, but it’s common knowledge that voter rolls are a mess. Invariably when they try to clean them up, they use a bulldozer however. I have very little confidence that they will take the time required to do a proper job of it.
Disagree. The desire to “signal” the lack of desire to vote should be not voting and nothing more, and the state certainly should not use a perceived desire to disenfranchise.
Well, that is where we differ. I believe that voting should be an positive right that the voter chooses to exercise, not a negative right that the state can remove on a whim.
On Election Day, I saw hundreds of people stream into the polls who asked one question “Give me the list of endorsed candidates. I need to know who to vote for”.
Should those people be disenfranchised?
Is not having your vote depend on what total strangers have decided are the proper candidates the very epitome of lazy and apathetic?
The opinion quoted, at least to me, appears to be if they don’t vote for my guy - then they are lazy and apathetic. The logic being those that aren’t lazy and apathetic would be voting for my guy.