Rogan asks about the vaccine efficacy window. Malone says it seems to be ever shrinking and goes on to mention that in some studies (cites Denmark study) there is a negative efficacy (higher risk of being infected) shown with increasing doses. Says this is specific to Omicron.
No idea what study is being referenced there though.
It’s 2022, we lost hope in the pee tape being real many years ago. But regardless, even if I we were to consider everything related Trump and Russia to be a conspiracy theory, its a fleck of dust compared to all the conspiracy theories the right is currently believing. It’s like if side A committed genocide and side B was like, ya know, that genocide was really bad, and side A was like, well you shot someone once.
You should know…you were one of the sheople here in Hannity Land, regurgibleating that nonsense and bleating orange man baaa, baaa, baaad. You did this for 3 years so…if I’m to remind you of just how foolish you are for the same length of time, we’ve go well over a year to go.
Its hypocritical to call people “sheople” and accuse them of “regurgibleating” when you do the same thing all the time, so I’m not sure why you continue to do so.
I never used the phrase “orange man bad” and I know you didn’t invent it, so why are you “regurgibleating” it when you are so against “regurgibleating”?
Also you’re lumping me in with other posters as I wasn’t particularly active in the Russian collusion threads.
Let me ask you this: What’s the different between people learning about something through the media and repeating it vs sheople learning about something through the media and “regurgibleating” it?
I’ve found there’s very little to “learn” from the present media. Every once in a while, if you listen to what they may be denying, it may have some truth in it…but it’s just a tad. Hold onto it. Some time later, there’ll be another…now connect the two. This had been my mode of operandi for years now, hence…drip, drip, drip. That’s how the media feeds the truth. It comes in very small drips and it’s now up to the observer to be able to connect the dots of truth.
How much time must pass before you can validate (or invalidate) an article or segment? Have you ever found patterns for any particular media outlet being valid a majority of the time?
Omicron has evaded the neutralizing antibodies…of that there is no doubt. I don’t know which Danish study he is talking about either. I’ll see if I can find it.
But Omicron has NOT evaded memory cell response. There is still a robust response there, which is what makes Omicron nothing worse than a bad cold for most vaccinated people.
Oh btw the South African study showed the same response for those who had previously had a COVID infection.
So pretty much everyone is gonna get Omicron but it looks to be not as severe….for vaxxed/previously infected people for sure…we will have to see for unvaxxed (I think our overstuffed hospitals are because of leftover Delta, not Omicron).
This is why we need to do a Canada shift and stop talking about total cases. We don’t talk about or track total flu cases…only those that end up resulting in serious illness/hospitalization. If we counted those, in the winter time we would see daily case counts almost as high as we see for Omicron.
We are so close, IMO, from shifting from pandemic to endemic. Our thinking needs to start adapting along with this shift.