Hypothesis 3. Durham knows that sny charges laid under the present partisan FBI and DOJ tried in DC would produce not guilty decisions. So he has tabulated the evidence ready for a purged DoJ and FBI to pick up and prosecute after 2024.
wow! They can read Putinās mind too!
well, yeah, he like everyone else thought she would win, he wanted to damage her politically before she became president
true
false
hirelings of the Clinton campaign did though
it seems to be okay with you
2 Likes
DougBH
632
You may be receiving a summons from Putin for that implication.
1 Like
Thereās this thing called the statute of limitations, that you may have heard of.
But by all means, keep that faith alive.
1 Like
DougBH
634
The fourth hypothesis is that even if nothing was illegal, the biases of the FBI interfered with our elections and the functioning of the Trump administration. Trump was not only innocent of collusion but was suspected only due to the political interference of the FBI. That may not have direct legal implications, but it may have a good deal of political implications.
Wasnāt that the hypothesis that Durhamās three year investigation tested. Since he failed to come up with anything substantive ā got one guilty plea on a minor procedural issue involving a single person which hardly adds up to a systemic bias at the FBI ā we can safely conclude that Hypothesis 4 was ruled out by Durhamās years of work.
DougBH
636
Bias and weaponizing of our government agencies is what he found. They are highly important but not necessarily illegal.
2 Likes
NickN
637
The fake news and pollsters probably came up with this gimmick. Pelosi got sacked as Speaker that much is true⦠And I seriously doubt you can connect National politicians who actually ran for election/re-election in the 2020 mid-terms to be quoted in making such sweeping red wave declarations.
NickN
638
Promised by whom?
And be specific, what exactly does a huge majority get you in the Lower Chamber anyway?
For example, Pelosi got her impeachments crammed through with the exact same slim margin as McCarthy has now.
1 Like
You mean like your declaration that there is a red wave coming. 
NickN
640
Our hands in this forum extend predictions for fun, without anything on the line but foolish pride. On the other hand, pundits saying Pelosi being ousted is a not big deal is simply put in denial or deflection as no doubt a devastating loss for the Dems including Biden essentially now a lame duck.
1 Like
The FBI just made it up. The report shows everything the left believed was a lie. And the right was correct as usual. The left defends people who lie to them. Think about that!!!
3 Likes
Yes but they are predictions for fun based on what you are told and what you have learned is likely to happen.
The wave turned into a trickle. That should have never happened and yet it did. And blame has to primarily lie with the gop leadership. This includes President Trump.
Trying to rationalize it is going to cause more grief rather than wins.
rp5x5
645
What percentage of leftists and RINOS, KNOW it was all lies? How many relish in the lies and donāt care? āLies,ā are justified as necessary to win.
And they keep doing it. Itās all conspiracy.
2 Likes
WuWei
646
This actually was a conspiracy.
Probably a good idea to pause and self-reflect but neither of you will so lets keep going
Canāt find it, canāt hold the people who conspired responsible, canāt think of a single law or policy to be changed⦠Sure there was a conspiracy.
Are you confusing the FBI with the Oath Keepers?
There was a conspiracy.
Whether it fits the criminal definition of a conspiracy is a whole other conversation. Ethical violations abound!