Full Durham report

[Nemesis]

All media mate. Take a look at Breitbart, Newsmax, Gateway Pundit they whip up just as much hate with headlines.

[Nemesis]

You have an uphill battle with the treason justification.

[zantax]

@NickN

@Nemesis

I agree this is extremely bad for the FBI and as Jake Tapper said this does vindicateTrump to a degree but if I am reading everything correctly there will be no prosecutions.

How should we move on? Should someone else investigate?

Break the FBI up. The GOP led lower chamber of Congress can use this report to propose legal reform with its constitutional power of the purse.

But they won’t

[zantax]

@Nemesis

@NickN

@Nemesis

I agree this is extremely bad for the FBI and as Jake Tapper said this does vindicateTrump to a degree but if I am reading everything correctly there will be no prosecutions.

How should we move on? Should someone else investigate?

Break the FBI up. The GOP led lower chamber of Congress can use this report to propose legal reform with its constitutional power of the purse.

Are you saying dismantle the FBI and not replace it? I have no idea if an entity like the FBI is actually needed.

Needed but should be limited to fewer crime categories. And should not be able to dodge congressional oversight with sources and methods bull.

[FreeAndClear]

@zantax

@NickN

@Nemesis

I agree this is extremely bad for the FBI and as Jake Tapper said this does vindicateTrump to a degree but if I am reading everything correctly there will be no prosecutions.

How should we move on? Should someone else investigate?

Break the FBI up. The GOP led lower chamber of Congress can use this report to propose legal reform with its constitutional power of the purse.

But they won’t

Of course they won’t. This report screams of nothing other than. “Well don’t do that again ok? You promise? Pinky swear?”

[FreeAndClear]

The question remains whether the Horowitz and there Durham report and the Ig reports and even arguably the Mueller report were meant to placate rather than result in any kind of action.

[zantax]

@FreeAndClear

The question remains whether the Horowitz and there Durham report and the Ig reports and even arguably the Mueller report were meant to placate rather than result in any kind of action.

Well, neither report would exist if the FBI had not opened an investigation that didn’t have a valid predicate.

[FreeAndClear]

@zantax

@FreeAndClear

The question remains whether the Horowitz and there Durham report and the Ig reports and even arguably the Mueller report were meant to placate rather than result in any kind of action.

Well, neither report would exist if the FBI had not opened an investigation that didn’t have a valid predicate.

That whole valid predicate is his conclusion. You know that right?
That’s just his position. Yes he is a special prosecutor and his conclusion is valuable but it’s still his personal conclusion. It’s not set in any kind of stone.

He also concluded that two people broke the law and two juries disagreed . Sooo maybe we should take his conclusion with a grain of salt

But i know we won’t. Just a suggestion.

[zantax]

@FreeAndClear

@zantax

@FreeAndClear

The question remains whether the Horowitz and there Durham report and the Ig reports and even arguably the Mueller report were meant to placate rather than result in any kind of action.

Well, neither report would exist if the FBI had not opened an investigation that didn’t have a valid predicate.

That whole valid predicate is his conclusion. You know that right?
That’s just his position. Yes he is a special prosecutor and his conclusion is valuable but it’s still his personal conclusion. It’s not set in any kind of stone.

Pfft, we know where the false allegations originated. His political opponent.

[FreeAndClear]

We also know that he presented two cases to a jury and both were rebuffed.

So pfft indeed.

[zantax]

@FreeAndClear

We also know that he presented two cases to a jury and both were rebuffed.

So pfft indeed.

How does that alter the fact that the accusations came out of his political opponents back pocket?

[Smyrna]

@FreeAndClear

That whole valid predicate is his conclusion. You know that right?

Not concluding it when you’re supposed to be a professional and it’s obvious…then concludes it had a corrupt basis. Those involved like Comey and Strozk…should be prosecuted. It was done for political purposes…PERIOD!

Published June 14, 2018 1:20pm EDT
FBI agent Strzok reportedly texted ‘we’ll stop’ Trump from becoming president

The fact that it’s taken this long proves how vast, deep and united the political corruption actually is at our highest levels of government.

FBI agent Strzok reportedly texted 'we'll stop' Trump from becoming president

[FreeAndClear]

We were talking about predicate for the investigation. Whether there was is his conclusion his other conclusions were rebuffed by juries.

You guys are setting things in stone. It’s actually interesting to watch this take shape.

[FreeAndClear]

@Smyrna

@FreeAndClear

That whole valid predicate is his conclusion. You know that right?

Not concluding it when you’re supposed to be a professional and it’s obvious…then concludes it had a corrupt basis. Those involved like Comey and Strozk…should be prosecuted. It was done for political purposes…PERIOD!

Nobody is being prosecuted. The sols are gone. You have been sold a news story and now see it as irrefutable fact. May be that was the goal. May be

[Smyrna]

@FreeAndClear

Nobody is being prosecuted. The sols are gone. You have been sold a news story and now see it as irrefutable fact. May be that was the goal. May be

…and that stopped libs from prosecuting Trump…amirite? I know, I know…that’s different.

[FreeAndClear]

@Smyrna

@FreeAndClear

Nobody is being prosecuted. The sols are gone. You have been sold a news story and now see it as irrefutable fact. May be that was the goal. May be

…and that stopped libs from prosecuting Trump…amirite? I know, I know…that’s different.

It’s not different. Trump should not prosecuted and not only because of sols. The whole felony thing is a stretch and a half. It’s political full stop.

[zantax]

@FreeAndClear

We were talking about predicate for the investigation. Whether there was is his conclusion his other conclusions were rebuffed by juries.

You guys are setting things in stone. It’s actually interesting to watch this take shape.

Still are talking about it, they used accusations made by his opponent that were un corroborated as the predicate.

[zantax]

As for getting a conviction, apparently court is ok with political corruption.

U.S. Supreme Court tosses former Cuomo aide's bribery conviction

[zantax]

At this point you need to get them on film with a bag marked bribe and saying yes, I agree to do you a favor in exchange for this bribe.

[zantax]

Another example.

Jury Acquits Andrew Gillum, Former DeSantis Rival, of Lying to the F.B.I.