Therefore, be it RESOLVED, that this Convention express the belief that society has a responsibility to affirm through the laws of the state a high view of the sanctity of human life, including fetal life, in order to protect those who cannot protect themselves; and
work for legislation that will allow the possibility of abortion under such conditions as rape, incest, clear evidence of severe fetal deformity, and carefully ascertained evidence of the likelihood of damage to the emotional, mental, and physical health of the mother
Definitely not “open.” I will agree that the last clause is pro life problematic.
The Southern Baptist Convention, as preachy as it is, was not immune to the cancer of crit feminism.
This whole line of questioning you are on started because someone rejected to use of biblical quotes in a judicial ruling. We are not a theocracy. A libertarian like you claim to be should reject any notion of directly injecting scripture into rulings.
Man wrote the Christian bible and not need another book to do it. It was intuitive and innate. For example, most don’t need a book to initiatively know that killing another human is bad.
