Operating environment - violent riots, looting and burning.
You don’t know the difference?
You don’t know the difference?
“Indecipherable non sequitur posed as a question?”
If my Ovaltine decoder ring is working correctly, yes I read American Nations, no I don’t treat it as the sociological gospel with a reverence that rivals the Puritans and the King James Bible.
Between a mob and a group of people.
This SC as currently sat, will eventually dismantle most, if not all gun regs.
Any day now!
Yup, get used to it. This SC as currently sat, will eventually dismantle most, if not all gun regs. I wouldn’t be surprised if they even let violent felons have guns.
A return to the Constitution?
That last sentence is ridiculous.
Supreme_War_Pig:This SC as currently sat, will eventually dismantle most, if not all gun regs.
Any day now!
No, it will take some time, but it will happen
Supreme_War_Pig:Yup, get used to it. This SC as currently sat, will eventually dismantle most, if not all gun regs. I wouldn’t be surprised if they even let violent felons have guns.
A return to the Constitution?
That last sentence is ridiculous.
Well, I am not predicting it, but like I say, I wouldn’t be surprised.
After all, after their sentence is served, felons should be able to re-enter society, right?
After all, after their sentence is served, felons should be able to re-enter society, right?
After their sentence is served, are they felons?
Supreme_War_Pig:After all, after their sentence is served, felons should be able to re-enter society, right?
After their sentence is served, are they felons?
Shall not be infringed, remember?
SixFoot: Supreme_War_Pig:This SC as currently sat, will eventually dismantle most, if not all gun regs.
Any day now!
No, it will take some time, but it will happen
He tweeted out threats before the incident. He drove into a crowd.
Sounds like he went out looking for a confrontation…that’s not going to help his defense. No different than some yahoo carrying who starts trouble with someone then claims self defense after shooting the guy he started trouble with.
Jezcoe: WuWei:Mob, not “people”.
Interesting.
Operating environment - violent riots, looting and burning.
I will take what none of the the things happening in front of the McCloskey’s house for $100 Alex?
Supreme_War_Pig: SixFoot: Supreme_War_Pig:This SC as currently sat, will eventually dismantle most, if not all gun regs.
Any day now!
No, it will take some time, but it will happen
All the conservatives favor gun rights and there are five of 'em. They don’t even need Robert’s anymore. You wait and see.
Why didn’t you mention Garret Foster was a veteran as well? Maybe because he’s not on “'your side” and you’re not looking for the extra sympathy points? Y’all love to point out how Babbit was a vet, funny how its not important that the victim here is a vet as well.
Which is going to be awesome.
This is a great world we are going into.
“There are conflicting accounts as to whether Foster raised the rifle to the driver first”
Yup…now is gonna come down to who pointed at who first…too bad one guy is dead and cant defend himself
WuWei: Supreme_War_Pig:After all, after their sentence is served, felons should be able to re-enter society, right?
After their sentence is served, are they felons?
Shall not be infringed, remember?
Did you answer the question?
Due process for acts committed, remember?
WuWei: Jezcoe: WuWei:Mob, not “people”.
Interesting.
Operating environment - violent riots, looting and burning.
I will take what none of the the things happening in front of the McCloskey’s house for $100 Alex?
In their city. And the mob broke in.
Not if he pointed it
And thus the gist of his defense.
It is legal to carry an ak-47 in Texas. You just can’t point it at persons or people.
Whether he did or not will be for a jury of his peers to decide.
Let’s see what comes out at the trial before assigning guilt or not guilty
And weigh the evidence presented.
That’s the rational and unbiased way to do things.
Allan