You can read the stories as well as anyone. One of the latest is a money laundering scheme involving the Bidens and Clinton Campaign in which US aid dollars were going over and being used unlawfully buying favor here.
There are also records of Burisma’s Lawyers leveraging their relationship with Hunter to get them to put pressure on the president to fire the prosecutor or get the case dropped.
But then you knew that already.
JayJay
November 24, 2019, 10:18pm
144
WildRose:
You can read the stories as well as anyone. One of the latest is a money laundering scheme involving the Bidens and Clinton Campaign in which US aid dollars were going over and being used unlawfully buying favor here.
There are also records of Burisma’s Lawyers leveraging their relationship with Hunter to get them to put pressure on the president to fire the prosecutor or get the case dropped.
But then you knew that already.
Those are “John Solomon Stories”.
Lol!
“When you can’t dispute the facts… .”
JayJay
November 24, 2019, 10:24pm
146
The problem is he has no verifiable facts.
Everything he has came from a small cadre of incredibly corrupt individuals.
You’ll notice the GOP attempted to get John Solomon into the inquiry records last week.
You’ll equally notice of all the witnesses they wanted to get, the one they scrupulously avoided trying to subpoena was…John Solomon.
Think about that…they tried to get neither him nor his records…not even to see if the Dems would reject him and then the GOP could claim cover-up.
They want to use Solomon’s dreck without actually putting Solomon to the test.
Surely you can see why
Same reason Rudy keeps talking about his “credible witnesses”…but doesn’t dare let anyone know those witnesses’ names.
1 Like
JayJay
November 24, 2019, 10:31pm
147
They don’t want these people to actually come here.
Then everyone would know who they were and what utterly corrupt dirtbags they are.
They want to keep the innuendo going.
BlueTex
November 24, 2019, 10:35pm
148
WildRose:
You can read the stories as well as anyone. One of the latest is a money laundering scheme involving the Bidens and Clinton Campaign in which US aid dollars were going over and being used unlawfully buying favor here.
There are also records of Burisma’s Lawyers leveraging their relationship with Hunter to get them to put pressure on the president to fire the prosecutor or get the case dropped.
But then you knew that already.
And the chairman of the board, Alan Apter, knew nothing of this? How did he ignore all this money being laundered through Burisma?
Bodecea
November 24, 2019, 10:39pm
150
What happened to Rudy’s subpoena in the Senate?
1 Like
Yovanovitch also had American journalists targeted for surveillance.
These people are sick!
There are times during research when searching for details leaves the obviously immediate questions unanswered. This is one of those examples. Judicial Watch is hot on the trail of a State Department effort to monitor domestic political...
Est. reading time: 3 minutes
JayJay
November 24, 2019, 11:32pm
152
You do realize this has been completely debunked.
She was monitoring their public statements using CrowdTangle, a publicly available tool a lot of people use.
There was no secret surveillance campaign.
Like most Obama appointees she is as crooked as “heck”.
1 Like
DougBH
November 25, 2019, 2:02am
155
I believe I was once told you hold the investigation to find the facts.
JayJay
November 25, 2019, 2:20am
156
You have to have credible reasons to begin one in the first place, not completely made up stuff (and unlike the Steele Dossier, that Solomon’s work is a fabrication is right out in the open. Hiding in plain sight because they know those that want to believe will believe without further research).
BlueTex
November 25, 2019, 2:23am
157
Hmmm. She was also a Bush appointee and a Trump appointee…It’s almost like there is a difference between a career diplomat and a political appointee…
2 Likes
JayJay
November 25, 2019, 2:25am
158
And as I pointed out…that she was using state power to surveil people is a total fabrication.
JayJay
November 25, 2019, 2:36am
161
Weedhopper:
Nope.
Yep.
Your first clue it was wrong should have been that it was from Judicial Watch.
This isn’t anything like the Mueller hoax.