Agreed. Especially considering they testified under oath the border was secure, all while millions and millions of illegal aliens were crossing. Oh…sorry…that was Biden’s DHS.
3 Likes
Because you said this:
Helpful hint:
Just because something is available does not mean that someone has it.
Heck. AIDS is available. You don’t have it. I don’t have it. Altair doesn’t have it. If you want it, you can do get it.
Hope that helps.
If he knows it’s available he could point me to it. I don’t think it’s available yet.
I just ignore their demands to follow them down their rabbit holes.
2 Likes
He could.
Have you given anyone reason to do scavenger hunts for you? (Hint: No.)
And your history here is plain. Even if someone gave you a link, you would read it with a goal of finding something to nit-pick.
Pump up your own Google-fu and quit trolling.
3 Likes
I’ve looked.
I don’t think it exists.
You have a funny habit of butting in to hurl a few insults and add nothing to the conversation.
That’s trolling.
1 Like
It’s loneliness. Boredom for the rest of us. 
I’m trying to help you.
Take it as a gift.
Sorry if truth hurts and seems like an insult to you. You can change that.
Hope that helped.
4 Likes
They think I’m Wikipedia.
2 Likes
There is only 1 ways to look at it:
Either you work with the Feds OR you aid and abet a criminal.
It is NOT a matter of shades of gray.
Law is preety much a black and white world.
Everything else and in between is just a SPIN.
2 Likes
Some things states want the right to do are wrong.
The Confederacy was fighting for states rights too. I would presume that even you are not so libbishly agendized as to make the same stupid point about them for that.
1 Like
…while 
side with those choosing to break our laws. That makes complicit.
How can you not be ashamed?
1 Like
I’m not arguing for state’s rights. I’m pointing out the hypocrisy of those that do on multiple issues now arguing against state’s rights.
OK, then do you honestly believe that those who argue for states rights would say it’s a blanket argument and should apply to what the Confederacy too? Of course you don’t. I truly believe you don’t.
And I truly believe you know why your argument about states rights here was nothing but trollishness.
“We have operational control at the southern border…” Alejandro Mayorkas.
And you libs applauded…
Now you have the nerve to question our current Department of Homeland Security as it solves the crisis your people caused.
Priceless.
3 Likes
And guess what dude…When the state of Texas was trying to defend it’s Southern Border during the Biden Border invasion you and the rest of your lib buddies were emphatic we had no right to do so because immigration is only a federal issue. So please just stop with the hypocrisy lectures.
3 Likes
First, I want to point out, I didn’t bring up the Confederacy, you did. But I have heard over and over again here about the valid states rights argument of the civil war and about how that is what the ware was really about, and how the war of northern aggression steam rolled over the very important question of states rights. I can’t tell you for sure any of our current crew of board members holds those views, but there were some long lasting and high spirited threads on the subject in the past. So yes, I do think some states rights advocates apply it to slavery. I’ve heard them do it.
I was thinking of more recent positions, abortion in particular, where conservatives celebrated the ability of states to govern themselves.
I actually didn’t care if Texas wanted to use their resources on border security.
But the arguments of who should control an international border is not the same as how does a state administer justice re: state crimes and punishment.
Of course I did. It helps you realize how stupid your point was.
I hope it worked.