NYC had 7000 criminal invaders in custody. Their crimes included drug trafficking, sexual assault, battery and 29 cases of homicide. Rather than turning these animals over to immigration for deportation, they turned them loose on the public. You heard that right. They would rather have predators terrorizing citizens than having them sent home where they belong. Sorry libs, But your cult has lost it’s mind.
6 Likes
State-sponsored terrorism, courtesy of the left.
9 Likes
Have you noticed that our lib friends remain strangely silent when their dipshiddery is exposed?
3 Likes
Just keep in mind the only source for this is the DHS. So just take that for what it’s worth.
Also this comes down to sanctuary city stuff and whether state governments honor ICE detainer requests. NYC doesn’t apparently.
And when DHS says these people were released, that’s a bit misleading. It’s hard to pin down but it seems like they were released pending trial, on bail, completed sentences, etc. DHS wants you to believe they were arrested for murder and then released scott free.
DHS is mad NYC isn’t detaining these individuals long enough to hand them over to ICE. Fair enough I suppose. I’d be mad if I were them too.
1 Like
OK. Then what are democrats saying about it? Just keep in mind that these records are open to the public. Either 7000 records were faked and the democrats are choosing to remain silent about it or, someone spent a lot of time committing a fraud and should probably go to prison. What is your evidence that this is all bull ■■■■■
The fact that your media and your politicians are saying nothing should be enough. You actually believe that NYC would remain quiet if they were falsely accused of releasing 7000 criminal invaders?
Now that you have had the chance to think about it. What is your opinion of this atrocity?
1 Like
I didn’t say any of it was false. I was just pointing out that these numbers came directly from DHS via a press release.
Everything that came out under Obama and Biden regimes were absolute facts…right libs.
2 Likes
Ok. Do you think they did the right thing when they released all of these barbarians into the general population?
ITT states rights conservatives are mad about a state using their rights.
The better question would be, do you think NYC should have detained these people so that ICE could take custody of them. Personally, I don’t know. I think in some cases, yes, they should be held until ICE can take custody. In other cases, maybe not. Ultimately, NYC was following their normal protocols when these people were released.
We’ll see what kind of mayhem these barbarians create and how NYC deals with it. If at all.
1 Like
Immigration is a federal issue.
3 Likes
I think they should have handed over those guilty of violent offenses.
I’m waiting to hear the real story. You can’t really trust this DHS.
How the state handles release is a state issue.
I’d be for handing over violent criminals BTW.
Yes, it’s state issue to determine how they want to work with the feds. But it’s legal for feds to come in and get em themselves. And that’s precisely what they’re doing.
3 Likes
OK.
This thread is complaining about NY choosing not to work with the feds.
Which is an odd complaint for a states rights conservative.
That’s the state prerogatives…to release criminals back onto the streets.
1 Like
And the libs prerogative to applaud and side with that action.
2 Likes
They need to admit that they would prefer/side with illegal criminal element before caving into a moderate president and his centrist supporters.
2 Likes
They do have the right to ignore administrative detainers, apparently. But that is why sanctuary cities need more ICE. And the federal government has the right to put them there without interference.
3 Likes
