Nothing solves a food shortage like killing the farmers.
Yes, the US only supports freedom and democracy when it is convenient.
India appears to be far ahead Canada in terms of âthe right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievancesâ.
The history of the Soviet Union and Communist China shows that government confiscation of farmland from productive farmers does not go well either.
Millions starved to death in the resulting famines.
The bright side is, there are other leaders in the world that are as dumb as Brandon. He isnât all alone.
Kill the trouble makers and give their property to farmers who donât disrupt the food supply.
Those farmers are resorting to this tactic precisely because their individual labor isnât valuable enough to be missed in a strike.
history never repeats
Kill the trouble makers and give their property to farmers who donât disrupt the food supply.
Those farmers are resorting to this tactic precisely because their individual labor isnât valuable enough to be missed in a strike.
So there are just extra farmers around? Do you know how to farm?
These guys have to block entrances because there are other farmers and their own labor is replaceable.
The bright side is, there are other leaders in the world that are as dumb as Brandon.
Imagine how dumb Biden is and consider he is the best Democrats have to offer. What does that say about the intelligence of the rest of them?
Libs/authoritarians always do.
Meanwhile you seen where the police open fired in Netherlands killing unarmed 16 year old.
This is why I said police is NOT your friendâŚthey will do whatever the fascist tells em to do.
GIVE their property?
Can I give away your car or home because I donât like the way you drive or the paint color on your house?
No.
If I was killed for purposely disrupting a nations food supply? Probably.
History never repeats, but it often rhymes.
What should the US State Department response be?
Should they keep with these points from the farmer protests in India?
The Climate Change agenda is a totalitarian ideology thatâs designed to impoverish citizens in order to make them easier to control. Thereâs very little difference at its core from Maoâs âGreat Leap Forward,â and if elite leftists actually believed there was a threat theyâd cease their lifestyles and declare war on China and India today.
If I was killed for purposely disrupting a nations food supply? Probably.
Umm, I think that is what their government is going to do. Should they protest or should those folks be killed?
Obviously they should be killed if theyâre threatening other peopleâs food supply. Canât think of any population that would tolerate it. There are other ways to protest, that donât involve artificial famines.
Obviously they should be killed if theyâre threatening other peopleâs food supply. Canât think of any population that would tolerate it. There are other ways to protest, that donât involve artificial famines.
It isnât the farmers who are creating a crisis. It is the politiciansâ who are closing 30% - 70% of farms to reduce nitrogen âpollutionâ.
If Russia produces 12% of global oil and causes disruption, what do you think a 30% reduction in food supplies will do to a country?
It isnât the farmers who are creating a crisis
Theyâre literally blocking the gate so food canât be distributed.
They should shut up.