Let’s take a look at this. I think it is odd that FDA did this BEFORE that Chinese Wuhan Virus surfaced.
The Geniuses are not saying anything about it now.
I can’t read the article behind the paywall, but the report I heard on the radio had a truly false claim made by Purell in it, though I don’t remember the exact details.
So under the claims Purell is making about their products, FDA finds that they are an over the counter drug or topical antibiotic or their advertising would indicate such a drug. All they have to do is creatively change the wording of their advertising.
According to the FDA letter, they are not anti viral. Therefore they would be as effective against flu or the current virus as soap, I would assume.
My guess they are reaping a fortune right now out of baseless beliefs in what it will do.
\
They absolutely do kill the virus, but the claims Purell is making start to fall into medical claims that make them an over the counter drug under FDA rules.
“Are PURELL® Hand Sanitizer products effective against the flu? The FDA does not allow hand sanitizer brands to make viral claims, but from a scientific perspective, influenza is an enveloped virus. Enveloped viruses in general are easily killed or inactivated by alcohol.”
I read the “does not allow hand sanitizer brands to make viral claims.” And yet, it is followed up by saying they do kill viruses. So you are right. But why don’t they let them say it if they do it?