Extrapolate. I doubt the conclusions would be much different.
I forget, are you the one who claims to be an expert in statistics?
Quite honestlyā¦ this thread illustrates why most liberals cannot perform sufficient analysis to challenge the global warming wackos. They take on faith anything with numbers that is put in front of them.
Extrapolate thisā¦
What a thread burn. Nice one biggestal.
Did you answer this before? I missed it.
You talking about integrated labor months worked by executive branch employees and comparing it with same from Bush administration?
Why not at least define what you mean by āgrewā? A sophomoric āfinal-initialā of all government calculation is silly and meaningless.
Quite honestlyā¦ this thread illustrates why most liberals cannot perform sufficient analysis to challenge the global warming wackos. They take on faith anything with numbers that is put in front of them.
Facts matter.
And integrated labormonths of the executive branch over the terms of office are the facts. What does THAT calculation show? Maybe it supports the OP rant, maybe it doesnāt. I dont know.
And I would add ā¦ exclude active duty military.
In my business, I donāt typically answer questions without understanding the context. Thus far Iāve seen no context so I donāt feel compelled to provide a substantive response.
In my business, I donāt typically answer questions without understanding the context. Thus far Iāve seen no context so I donāt feel compelled to provide a substantive response.
You too?!
Thanking Peek for that laugh. Dude should be doing stand up.
Why not at least define what you mean by āgrewā? A sophomoric āfinal-initialā of all government calculation is silly and meaningless
The gentleman from the calculated risk blog didnāt think it silly or meaningless.
Grew. What is the definition of is, is.
Grew is self explanatory. Either is grew or it didnāt grow.
Allan
And I would add ā¦ exclude active duty military.
Already done earlier in the thread.
Allan
I canāt help you, dude, if you dont understand what I mean by or the relevance of the integrated labor months of the executive branch over the presidential terms.
I canāt help you, dude, if you dont understand what I mean by or the relevance of the integrated labor months of the executive branch over the presidential terms.
LOL. Read the calculatedrisk blog link earlier in the thread and all will be answered.
LOL.
I do understand the difference between growth and no growth.
sorry you are no quite grasping the question posed Its a real simple one.
Read the blog and answer the question. Its not macro economics.
it a simple question with one of two answers. Fact or fiction?
Allan
Labor months expended over the presidential term to perform the functions of the executive branch.
Itās an integrated numberā¦ not simply a subtraction of the initial number from final number.
Then compare one presidentās terms with another.
Labor months expended over the presidential term to perform the functions of the executive branch.
Itās an integrated numberā¦ not simply a subtraction of the initial number from final number.
read the blog. its all explained there.
Allan