First let me apologize for using CNN. For most search engines you have to go through three or four pages of liberal crap before you find your first conservative source. I was impatient. Apparently, a TDS judge over stepped her authority (again) when she ordered it closed. Sorry libs, your beloved rapists, child sexual offenders, human traffickers, cartel members and the like will be staying in the swamp. First FSU knocks off Bama, now this! A good week for Florida!
2 Likes
I’d accept your apology about using CNN except the source that you did use appears to be considerably crappier than CNN 
1 Like
My source used a CNN article. That’s the double whammy. Dipshiddery on parade/
4 Likes
The activist judges are starting to cry.
“Ten of the 12 judges argued the Supreme Court should offer more explanation when overturning such decisions, saying emergency rulings in such cases imply poor work on the part of lower court judges.“
By gosh, I think they get it.
4 Likes
damn. a big blow to the brainless galloping leftist ninnies
4 Likes
Yay! Concentration camp stays open!
2 Likes
there’s enough posting here you dont need to rile up posters
Truth be like that.
for shizzle huh?
excuse me “fo” shizzle
Just in time too!!
1 Like
the lower courts are on a mission
Well they’re not wrong. If you’re going to use the emergency docket to overturn a ruling you should probably provide guidance as to whether lower courts should take it as precedent without explanation.
1 Like
they very well could be.
that is not a requirement
The SCOTUS has a bad habit of that. Has for years.
1 Like
Should be.
Yes…great news.
2 Likes
No one said it’s a requirement. But not every rocket docket decisions is precedent setting - and with no say, courts can’t know if one is supposed to be (nor the relevant rationale).
i didn’t say someone said it was
no one is saying anything about setting precedents
I think it’s become a lot more relevant as the emergency docket has become so heavily used in recent years - and for resolving major legal questions.
1 Like
WEll that’s not really the important part. The important part is that SCOTUS isn’t clear about which emergency docket decisions should be considered precedent, so lower courts don’t have the information or the rationale.
Without the rationale how are lower courts supposed to know if the precedent applies in a decision they are attempting make?
1 Like
