That’s the point. Her announcement is nothing more than bald-faced political grandstanding.
NRA are a lobbyist group.
and of course she is she is a U.S senator.
Whats your point?
She stated that the reason gun control hasn’t happened is because the NRA has folks in Congress under control, and that she isn’t one of them nor will she ever be.
You’re right, she is a woman of principle. Is that all you were getting at? And why the dumb Pocahontas jab? Unless we get DNA testing to prove it, if she was told she was part Native American why is it so important to discredit what she was told with no proof to the contrary?
Seems petty to me.
pretty much
So you take everything politicians say at face value?
Wow.
Yeah! When? Can’t wait until after the election like Dems!
Amazing. THEY ARE NEVER GOING TO OFFER HER MONEY!
The tribe she claims to belong to says she ain’t; who you think speaks with forked tongue?
What’s the hold up on a DNA test.
Squawk! Pretty much Squawk!
Trump announces he won’t take any money from La Raza.
We were thinking more in the line of an FBI investigation. Has she talked to any furreigners?
She attacked the noble and courageous FBI.
Do you want an atta boy for stating the obvious?
Has she returned or paid reparations for culturally appropriating native American recipes? Or her professor salary when she filled the native American quota? Where is the principle?
She IS taking money from the National Bow and Arrow Association
Well, DNA is unreliable for North American ancestries. Its much more reliable for Asian or African ones. Even if it showed NA ancestry it wouldn’t show what tribe. There are lots of NA citizens who have negative DNA results, despite having documented ancestry. Documentation for Cherokee relies on the Dawes registry, which happened over a hundred years ago and was voluntary. If your ancestor didn’t want to register you are out of luck there.
So, in short there is no benefit for her doing it. She was raised in Oklahoma, where a lot of Native Americans live. Her parents eloped because they belonged to different tribes, so she was told.
She never used her heritage, or what she thought it was, to her benefit. She first mentioned it months after she was tenured at Harvard, and once you are tenured you are pretty set.
1 Like
It’s changed a lot since those days, & no one seems to care about history.
Truly sad.
It’s good from a colony based on Puritan work ethic to one dominated by child like individuals who want something for nothing.
Those are types are the vast majority of voters here.
I’m not the woman’s biggest fan. But even I say the fuss about if she does or doesn’t have indigenous tribal heritage is silly.
She probably was told of her heritage as many of us are—by family. Must be a lot of families out there who are liars if that’s what it is when repeating stories that were told generation after generation.
Many indigenous Americans are racially mixed. Are they included in this so called native American quota? And if so, why wouldn’t she be included if she is qualified to teach?
warren is principally dishonest.
What woman is running for potus currently?
