Education>Culture>Politics

WuWei · 2021-07-05T00:04:32.310Z

It’s not working.

PurpnGold · 2021-07-05T00:09:17.485Z

WuWei:

It’s not working.

You fell for it… you didn’t read the article. The article title got you salivating, like Wile E Coyote. Then roadrunner got you again.

WuWei · 2021-07-05T01:54:13.941Z

PurpnGold:

WuWei:

It’s not working.

You fell for it… you didn’t read the article. The article title got you salivating, like Wile E Coyote. Then roadrunner got you again.

You know that’s not true. It’s not working.

WuWei · 2021-07-05T15:49:28.406Z

C. Publicly (through existing media) convey its support for the accurate and honest teaching of social studies topics, including truthful and age-appropriate accountings

https://ra.nea.org/business-item/2021-nbi-039/

Who is going to determine "age-appropriate’?

What age student takes “social studies”?

What age is the NEA talking about here? Undergrad, grad school? PhD programs?

PurpnGold · 2021-07-05T15:53:33.356Z

WuWei:

Who is going to determine "age-appropriate’?

Each school board

WuWei:

What age student takes “social studies”?

My kids started taking social studies in first grade

WuWei:

What age is the NEA talking about here? Undergrad, grad school? PhD programs?

I believe k-12

WuWei · 2021-07-05T15:54:39.349Z

PurpnGold:

Each school board

Is that what the NEA policy says?

PurpnGold:

My kids started taking social studies in first grade

K-12?

PurpnGold:

I believe k-12

Destroying your own narrative. Impressive.

Rurudyne · 2021-07-05T15:58:14.738Z

Also, on average the Left is against any form of nuclear power. badaboomkisk

PurpnGold · 2021-07-05T16:07:13.435Z

WuWei:

Is that what the NEA policy says?

You tell me… it’s your link

WuWei:

K-12?

Do you not know what that means?

WuWei · 2021-07-05T16:21:44.698Z

PurpnGold:

You tell me… it’s your link

Did you read it?

It’s not working.

PurpnGold:

Do you not know what that means?

Yes, are you sure you do? You use it a lot.

Haven’t you said CRT “is a lens”?

PurpnGold · 2021-07-05T16:24:23.242Z

WuWei:

PurpnGold:

You tell me… it’s your link

Did you read it?

It’s not working.

It’s your link. You thought it was useful… you didn’t even read it before posting yesterday. And you got caught.

Now you want me to do more work for you?

WuWei:

Yes, are you sure you do? You use it a lot.

Kindergarten through 12th grade.

WuWei:

Haven’t you said CRT “is a lens”?

Yes, what is your point

WuWei · 2021-07-05T16:27:48.987Z

PurpnGold:

It’s your link. You thought it was useful… you didn’t even read it before posting yesterday. And you got caught.

Yes I did, and you know it. By your own admission and today. You are trying to interpret.

It’s not working.

PurpnGold:

Kindergarten through 12th grade.

Those same grades you keep saying “IT ISN’T HAPPENING!!!”?

PurpnGold:

Yes, what is your point

Do you really not know? Why do you keep demanding “curriculum and textbooks” for a “lens”?

Education>Culture>Hegemony

PurpnGold · 2021-07-05T16:35:18.867Z

WuWei:

Those same grades you keep saying “IT ISN’T HAPPENING!!!”?

Correct. CRT is not being taught in K-12. Your own link shows that.

You either did not read it or did not understand it. I think it is the former… you seem to be a smart guy.

WuWei · 2021-07-05T16:53:37.417Z

PurpnGold:

CRT is not being taught in K-12.

Is the lens being used?

PurpnGold · 2021-07-05T16:58:36.337Z

WuWei:

PurpnGold:

CRT is not being taught in K-12.

Is the lens being used?

Sure. However, the conservative charge is that CRT is being taught. If I am teaching about reconstruction and I use my CRT “lens” to examine the the role of the 1877 Compromise during reconstruction… is that teaching CRT? No.

WuWei · 2021-07-05T16:59:19.521Z

PurpnGold:

WuWei:

PurpnGold:

CRT is not being taught in K-12.

Is the lens being used?

Sure. However, the conservative charge is that CRT is being taught. If I am teaching about reconstruction and I use my CRT “lens” to examine the the role of the 1877 Compromise during reconstruction… is that teaching CRT? No.

You can’t be serious.

Paul_Thomson · 2021-07-05T17:09:32.874Z

PurpnGold:

Sure. However, the conservative charge is that CRT is being taught. If I am teaching about reconstruction and I use my CRT “lens” to examine the the role of the 1877 Compromise during reconstruction… is that teaching CRT? No.

The medium is the message.

WuWei · 2021-07-05T17:12:12.511Z

Paul_Thomson:

PurpnGold:

Sure. However, the conservative charge is that CRT is being taught. If I am teaching about reconstruction and I use my CRT “lens” to examine the the role of the 1877 Compromise during reconstruction… is that teaching CRT? No.

The medium is the message.

The medium is infecting the message. It is an intentional injection of bias to change the culture. No different than “lost cause” or “blame the Jews”.

PurpnGold · 2021-07-05T17:13:07.907Z

Paul_Thomson:

PurpnGold:

Sure. However, the conservative charge is that CRT is being taught. If I am teaching about reconstruction and I use my CRT “lens” to examine the the role of the 1877 Compromise during reconstruction… is that teaching CRT? No.

The medium is the message.

This does not make sense.

WuWei · 2021-07-05T17:13:50.969Z

PurpnGold:

Paul_Thomson:

PurpnGold:

Sure. However, the conservative charge is that CRT is being taught. If I am teaching about reconstruction and I use my CRT “lens” to examine the the role of the 1877 Compromise during reconstruction… is that teaching CRT? No.

The medium is the message.

This does not make sense.

It does when the lens isn’t distorting your vision.

PurpnGold · 2021-07-05T17:14:02.094Z

WuWei:

The medium is infecting the message. It is an intentional injection of bias to change the culture. No different than “lost cause” or “blame the Jews”.

CRT is nothing like the “lost cause”. You have gone off the deep end.