It’s not working.
You fell for it… you didn’t read the article. The article title got you salivating, like Wile E Coyote. Then roadrunner got you again.
You know that’s not true. It’s not working.
C. Publicly (through existing media) convey its support for the accurate and honest teaching of social studies topics, including truthful and age-appropriate accountings
https://ra.nea.org/business-item/2021-nbi-039/
Who is going to determine "age-appropriate’?
What age student takes “social studies”?
What age is the NEA talking about here? Undergrad, grad school? PhD programs?
Who is going to determine "age-appropriate’?
Each school board
What age student takes “social studies”?
My kids started taking social studies in first grade
What age is the NEA talking about here? Undergrad, grad school? PhD programs?
I believe k-12
Each school board
Is that what the NEA policy says?
My kids started taking social studies in first grade
K-12?
I believe k-12
Destroying your own narrative. Impressive.
Also, on average the Left is against any form of nuclear power. badaboomkisk
Is that what the NEA policy says?
You tell me… it’s your link
K-12?
Do you not know what that means?
You tell me… it’s your link
Did you read it?
It’s not working.
Do you not know what that means?
Yes, are you sure you do? You use it a lot.
Haven’t you said CRT “is a lens”?
PurpnGold:You tell me… it’s your link
Did you read it?
It’s not working.
It’s your link. You thought it was useful… you didn’t even read it before posting yesterday. And you got caught.
Now you want me to do more work for you?
Yes, are you sure you do? You use it a lot.
Kindergarten through 12th grade.
Haven’t you said CRT “is a lens”?
Yes, what is your point
It’s your link. You thought it was useful… you didn’t even read it before posting yesterday. And you got caught.
Yes I did, and you know it. By your own admission and today. You are trying to interpret.
It’s not working.
Kindergarten through 12th grade.
Those same grades you keep saying “IT ISN’T HAPPENING!!!”?
Yes, what is your point
Do you really not know? Why do you keep demanding “curriculum and textbooks” for a “lens”?
Education>Culture>Hegemony
Those same grades you keep saying “IT ISN’T HAPPENING!!!”?
Correct. CRT is not being taught in K-12. Your own link shows that.
You either did not read it or did not understand it. I think it is the former… you seem to be a smart guy.
CRT is not being taught in K-12.
Is the lens being used?
PurpnGold:CRT is not being taught in K-12.
Is the lens being used?
Sure. However, the conservative charge is that CRT is being taught. If I am teaching about reconstruction and I use my CRT “lens” to examine the the role of the 1877 Compromise during reconstruction… is that teaching CRT? No.
WuWei: PurpnGold:CRT is not being taught in K-12.
Is the lens being used?
Sure. However, the conservative charge is that CRT is being taught. If I am teaching about reconstruction and I use my CRT “lens” to examine the the role of the 1877 Compromise during reconstruction… is that teaching CRT? No.
You can’t be serious.
Sure. However, the conservative charge is that CRT is being taught. If I am teaching about reconstruction and I use my CRT “lens” to examine the the role of the 1877 Compromise during reconstruction… is that teaching CRT? No.
The medium is the message.
PurpnGold:Sure. However, the conservative charge is that CRT is being taught. If I am teaching about reconstruction and I use my CRT “lens” to examine the the role of the 1877 Compromise during reconstruction… is that teaching CRT? No.
The medium is the message.
The medium is infecting the message. It is an intentional injection of bias to change the culture. No different than “lost cause” or “blame the Jews”.
PurpnGold:Sure. However, the conservative charge is that CRT is being taught. If I am teaching about reconstruction and I use my CRT “lens” to examine the the role of the 1877 Compromise during reconstruction… is that teaching CRT? No.
The medium is the message.
This does not make sense.
Paul_Thomson: PurpnGold:Sure. However, the conservative charge is that CRT is being taught. If I am teaching about reconstruction and I use my CRT “lens” to examine the the role of the 1877 Compromise during reconstruction… is that teaching CRT? No.
The medium is the message.
This does not make sense.
It does when the lens isn’t distorting your vision.
The medium is infecting the message. It is an intentional injection of bias to change the culture. No different than “lost cause” or “blame the Jews”.
CRT is nothing like the “lost cause”. You have gone off the deep end.