“biden called an audible”
It’s been reported all over. How you “missed” it would be a mystery if we didn’t know you know this already and choose to ignore it.
1 Like
Comer:
"
President Biden’s legacy is marked by abuse of public office, corruption, & obstruction. The evidence produced by our impeachment inquiry is the strongest case for impeachment of a sitting president the House of Representatives has ever investigated.
We have exposed the truth."
Rep. Moskowicz put forth a motion to go forward with impeachment. Neither Comer nor any other R would second it.
Why not?
1 Like
We shall see when the report is released.
Wasn’t it just released?
1 Like
You played stupid about the whole affair and now…you point your l’il finger elsewhere. You lose…again.
1 Like
I understand that it’s still too far outfront for your untrained eyes to see. I’ll wait for your apology down the road. That is…if you’re man enough?
Ah. Then no more comments till I have time to read it.
They know it.
You really think the VP has that kind of power? To make an audible call like that w/out talking to the POTUS, or anyone else involved? Seriously?
Sorry…the VP does not have that kind of power…except maybe Cheney. ;–)
Just like he did the first time around, right?
5 months ago??
Why does that matter? Joe did what Trump was accused of and impeached by corrupt Pelosi and Co. It’s an obvious, one sided, two-tier, weaponized political establishment that hopefully Trump will dismantle when elected?
1 Like
It’s true that Joe Biden leveraged $1 billion in aid to persuade Ukraine to oust its top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, in March 2016. But it wasn’t because Shokin was investigating Burisma. It was because Shokin wasn’t pursuing corruption among the country’s politicians.
As European and American diplomats pressed Ukraine to clean up its corruption, they focused on Shokin’s leadership of the Prosecutor General’s Office, which he took over in February 2015.
Mike Carpenter, who served as a foreign policy adviser to the then-vice president, told USA TODAY that Shokin “never went after any corrupt individuals at all” and “never prosecuted any high-profile cases of corruption.”
Prosecutor was not investigating Burisma at the time Joe Biden called for his removal
Burisma Holdings was not under scrutiny at the time Joe Biden called for Shokin to be removed, per the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, an independent agency that has worked closely with the FBI.
In 2014, Shokin had investigated Burisma for money laundering and tax irregularities, per USA TODAY.
The probe focused on 2010-12, according to the National Anti-Corruption Bureau.
Hunter Biden — who joined the board in 2014 and served on it until early 2019 — was not the subject of the investigation.
1 Like
The myth will never die.
It’s groundhog day
2 Likes
Uh, huh…keep swallowing the bull feces, sheople food attempting to rewrite history…
and don’t ever forget…orange man…baaaaa, baaaaa, baaaaaad. 
2 Likes
…said the 3 year Russian collusion swallowing, sheoplized lib that has no credibility left.
2 Likes
Facts aren’t bull feces.
The media doesn’t print facts. They feed their sheople the narratives they want spread.
2 Likes
But not the media you get your facts from?
