NOW your full of it.
The DNC knew they were Hacked and the FBI knew they were longer than a few ■■■■■■■ weeks.
June 2016 Crowdstrike informed the public many months before the FBI knew.
You continue to be wrong about everything. And now you very obviously ignore the two links I’ve given you multiple times.
Your obvious quibbling over describing the short period of weeks as more than a “few” is obvious. You want a number? 20 weeks. The FBI is not going to strip the victim bare, 20 weeks before the elections. In a 2 year election, 104 weeks, 20 is a few, bub.
Read the links, refute the evidence, or give up on this seth rich awan nonsense. Deal with reality.
2 Likes
Can you tell me what you’ve heard him say?
No. If Donald Trump had not become president, I would tell you all the stories. But the stakes are now high and I am an unreliable narrator. What I do, as much as anything, is I’m a storyteller. And storytellers are liars. So I can emotionally tell you things that happened racially, sexually, and that showed stupidity and lack of compassion when I was in the room with Donald Trump and I guarantee you that I will get details wrong. I would not feel comfortable talking about what I felt I saw in that room — because when I was on that show I was sleeping four to five hours a night. I was uncomfortable. “Stress” is the wrong word, but I was not at my best. Then at the end of a day, they put you in a room and they bring out a guy [Trump] who has no power whatsoever and he’s capricious and petty and …"
1 Like
I wouldn’t know about that. I do know that mostly gossip mag that they,(NE) are the lame stream media is much worse because they deliberately lie so much.
Hillllllaaarrrryyyyyy. Go ahead and investigate I dont care. Was the information stolen?
We know that Vesselnitskya met with the co-founder of Fusion GPS immediately prior to, and after the Trump tower meeting. That kind of coincidence makes the entire event sound like an orchestrated setup to me.
You’d have to ask those Russians working inside the Kremlin who supplied some of the "salacious and unverified’ rumors to Steele.
If you knew anything at all about computers you would know that a copy of the server is EXACTLY like having the server.
So then you do not approve of ANY Whistle Blower correct.
Because many of the Whistle Blowers have STOLEN the information you understand that.
I love coming here and seeing a conversation that was hashed out months ago being hashed out again…and there are people that try to pretend they’re bringing brand new information that no one has ever heard before.
2 Likes
I have read the stuff.
But they ignore CROWDStikes results completely.
I’m not lost down your rabbit hole, and these two sentences make no sense to me. You’re using your imagination and I’m not in there. I’m in reality.
What I’m telling you is there was no insider leak at the DNC to wikileaks. Mueller’s indictments lay out the GRU to wikileaks path. The additional links I gave you completely obliterate any of the seth rich nonsense. You’re months behind.
1 Like
The hell does this even mean? The Mueller indictments are not based on anything having to do with crowdstrike.
You’re really obsessed with the fact the FBI didn’t physically remove the servers. It seems you’re whole denial of whats occurring around you relies on that.
Where did that response say anything about the Servers.
Did or did not Crowdstrike confirm in June 2016 that the 2 bears working with with Russia were the ones that hacked the DNC Servers and Cozy Bear was in the Server for almost a year.
The Department seem to ignore those findings completely.
So I have doubt in the Mueller investigation results.
■■■ are you talking about YOU ARE ASSUMING I was talking about SETH RICH I AM NOT
I call doubt because JUNE 2016 Crowdstrike did the Investigation of the DNC servers before the FBI did. And Discovered that Cozy Bear was in the Server for almost a year. Do you deny that?
So how does Cozy Bear and the other bear fit into Muller’s Findings ? It doesn’t seem to be.
Have you not read the indictments?
Let’s just skip the part where you’re imagining things and I’m supposed to know what they are or how to follow.
Who hacked John Podesta’s email?
Who is Guccifer 2.0?
Who gave the dncc, dnc hacks to wikileaks?
My answers are all contained in the indictments. What are yours?
I think Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear fit into Mueller’s findings just fine. How do you supppse they don’t?
They did. They made a mirror copy.
Crowdstrike said that both the bears ARE NOT Guccifer 2.0 they had no relation to Guccifer.
I am not denying that Russia did this.
But we have Evidence presented on line by Crowdstrike pointing the trail.
What has Mueller shown us? Nothing they just made a statement and said these people did it and that it was Guccifer 2.0
Not when then claim Guccifer 2.0 did it.
Crowdstrike showed the evidence and the coding that they used and showed it was the Bears.
Again Not saying that Russia was not behind it,
But I am stating that Multiple people could have hacked the System and that Wikileaks MAY have not gotten it from Guccifer 2.0 Wikileaks founder has played the Word game as well.