Well, if Democrats are right and these are peaceful protests, then at least they won’t be coming to the Federal government and asking all taxpayers to bail them out. There won’t be any major damage.
Violence will never go to zero. Period. I can accept that and condemn violence and support policies that get as close to zero as possible.
I’m not seeing the outrage over a few violent protestors. Arrest them, prosecute them, throw them in jail. I feel conservatives are over looking the overwhelming majority of protestors who are peaceful
So there were non-Nazis attending a rally to save statues, but you don’t see why non-violent protestors would mix with arsonists and rock throwing rioters?
Gotta stop you right there. It was not a “rally to save statues”. It was an explicitly and openly a white supremacist rally. I imagine most of the people there were “innocent” of any crimes - but I still question why they showed up.
If you are part of a protest group that you know contains people throwing missiles and blasting lasers at police and federal officials, or destroying cars or setting fires, and you stay in that group, you are no longer part of a peaceful protest. You are at that point a part of a mob.
For those interested in what the ACLU has to say on the subject, the following site.
If you don’t have a permit, you don’t get in the street.
If violence occurs, then the police order a dispersal. After that, if you stay there…you are part of a rioting mob.
Well, you basically overlook the majority of everybody who is peaceful. If a building is burning, you sort of notice the arsonists.
But once the violence occurs and the police have order the crowd to disperse, then anyone who doesn’t is a willing part of a mob.
How many times have we heard those on the Right call liberal or black activists agitators,? Doesn’t exactly sound like no one has a problem with them does it?