Your support is not required. The evidence is overwhelming. Noooobody on the liberal side is demanding that the rioters shut down the violence. Can you name a few liberal organizations that are?
How am I excusing it, exactly?
Whether you intended to or not you answered the question for me regarding the veracity of your claim. Like I said before, it sounded outrageous on its face. Turns out it is outrageous and untrue. I couldn’t find a single article or any evidence in my research that said anything even remotely close to what you claimed. Figures.
Your support is not required. The evidence is overwhelming. Noooobody on the liberal side is demanding that the rioters shut down the violence. Can you name a few liberal organizations that are?
Your research is flawed and therefore so is your conclusion.
Thread fail.
Steel-W0LF: NebraskaFootball: TheDoctorIsIn: altair1013:I never provided cover for any right wing thug as the left has done here.
Ahem…
Fake news. He never said there were fine Neo Nazis. You can be opposed to removing a statue and not be a Nazi.
If you can be opposed to removing a statue (at a Nazi rally) and not be a Nazi, then surely you can protest police misconduct and not be deemed “violent” by proxy.
Ouch. That’s going to leave a hypocrisy mark.
Sure will.
Were you guys wrong then or now?
You guys? Show me my posts that are in direct opposition to one another as @TheDoctorIsIn did here and I’ll let you know.
Sure thing.
Here you go:
[quote=“TheDoctorIsIn, post:29, topic:233585, full:true”]If you can be opposed to removing a statue (at a Nazi rally) and not be a Nazi, then surely you can protest police misconduct and not be deemed “violent” by proxy.
[/quote]
Why would any “innocent” protesters participate in a neo-nazi rally?
Those two posts aren’t contradictory.
Those two posts aren’t contradictory.
Sure there not.
Sure there not.
They’re not. It’s not complicated.
Seems to me were are giving libs here a taste of their own medicine.
Steel-W0LF:Sure there not.
They’re not. It’s not complicated.
Are there any peaceful protestors at the Portland courthouse?
Are there any peaceful protestors at the Portland courthouse?
Yes, of course.
Steel-W0LF:Are there any peaceful protestors at the Portland courthouse?
Yes, of course.
Contradiction.
Why would any “innocent” protesters participate in a neo-nazi rally?
No, that’s not a contradiction. Those two statements can coexist comfortablely.
This is pretty basic stuff here.
No, that’s not a contradiction.
This is pretty basic stuff here.
I wish you would explain it though. Simple things can be difficult to grasp if they’re not spelled out.
NebraskaFootball: Steel-W0LF: NebraskaFootball: TheDoctorIsIn: altair1013:I never provided cover for any right wing thug as the left has done here.
Ahem…
Fake news. He never said there were fine Neo Nazis. You can be opposed to removing a statue and not be a Nazi.
If you can be opposed to removing a statue (at a Nazi rally) and not be a Nazi, then surely you can protest police misconduct and not be deemed “violent” by proxy.
Ouch. That’s going to leave a hypocrisy mark.
Sure will.
Were you guys wrong then or now?
You guys? Show me my posts that are in direct opposition to one another as @TheDoctorIsIn did here and I’ll let you know.
Sure thing.
Here you go:
[quote=“TheDoctorIsIn, post:29, topic:233585, full:true”]If you can be opposed to removing a statue (at a Nazi rally) and not be a Nazi, then surely you can protest police misconduct and not be deemed “violent” by proxy.
Why would any “innocent” protesters participate in a neo-nazi rally?
[/quote]
I don’t see my name anywhere in these posts. What am I missing?
TheDoctorIsIn: Steel-W0LF:Are there any peaceful protestors at the Portland courthouse?
Yes, of course.
Contradiction.
Why would any “innocent” protesters participate in a neo-nazi rally?
The Portland protest isn’t a ANTFIA protest.
I wish you would explain it though. Simple things can be difficult to grasp if they’re not spelled out.
Ok, I’ll do my best.
I believe there are non-violent protestors in Portland, and I question why a non-Nazi would choose to attend a Nazi rally.
Those two concepts are not mutually exclusive.
calirepub:I wish you would explain it though. Simple things can be difficult to grasp if they’re not spelled out.
Ok, I’ll do my best.
I believe there are non-violent protestors in Portland, and I question why a non-Nazi would choose to attend a Nazi rally.
Those two concepts are not mutually exclusive.
So non violent people can attend a protest by a violent leftist group and not be guilty by association.
But people can’t attend a protest by a violent right wing group without being guilty by association.
Yeah, there’s no contradiction. Makes perfect sense.
So non violent people can attend a protest by a violent leftist group
Which group are you referring to?
How am I excusing it, exactly?
Zero tolerance. Nothing less is acceptable. Unless of course it is?