Donald Trump and the MYTH of the "non violent" protester

[Blackwolf]

I disagree with your premise, based on all the media I have seen. The evidence is not there to support your allegation.

[altair1013]

@Blackwolf

I disagree with your premise, based on all the media I have seen. The evidence is not there to support your allegation.

Your support is not required. The evidence is overwhelming. Noooobody on the liberal side is demanding that the rioters shut down the violence. Can you name a few liberal organizations that are?

[PurpnGold]

@DMK

Then stop excusing it. No “but”. Condemn it 100%.

How am I excusing it, exactly?

[NebraskaFootball]

@altair1013

@NebraskaFootball

I already told you I don’t watch liberal media. You claimed you did. I asked which ones made the claim you suggest. And then you punt. That’s a really weak cop-out. It’s your claim. Which ones? Where is your evidence? Are we supposed to take your word here?

No. By all means do not take my word. You have three options.

1. Assume I’m telling the truth and believe that the media is pretty much giving the rioters a pass on the violence.

2. Believe that the media is demanding and end to the violence.

3. Research it for yourself.

Do those options seem reasonable to a Cornhusker?

Whether you intended to or not you answered the question for me regarding the veracity of your claim. Like I said before, it sounded outrageous on its face. Turns out it is outrageous and untrue. I couldn’t find a single article or any evidence in my research that said anything even remotely close to what you claimed. Figures.

[Blackwolf]

@altair1013

Your support is not required. The evidence is overwhelming. Noooobody on the liberal side is demanding that the rioters shut down the violence. Can you name a few liberal organizations that are?

Your research is flawed and therefore so is your conclusion.

Thread fail.

[Steel-W0LF]

@NebraskaFootball

@Steel-W0LF

@NebraskaFootball

@TheDoctorIsIn

@altair1013

I never provided cover for any right wing thug as the left has done here.

Ahem…

@altair1013

Fake news. He never said there were fine Neo Nazis. You can be opposed to removing a statue and not be a Nazi.

If you can be opposed to removing a statue (at a Nazi rally) and not be a Nazi, then surely you can protest police misconduct and not be deemed “violent” by proxy.

Ouch. That’s going to leave a hypocrisy mark.

Sure will.

Were you guys wrong then or now?

You guys? Show me my posts that are in direct opposition to one another as @TheDoctorIsIn did here and I’ll let you know.

Sure thing.

Here you go:

[quote=“TheDoctorIsIn, post:29, topic:233585, full:true”]If you can be opposed to removing a statue (at a Nazi rally) and not be a Nazi, then surely you can protest police misconduct and not be deemed “violent” by proxy.
[/quote]

@TheDoctorIsIn

Why would any “innocent” protesters participate in a neo-nazi rally?

[TheDoctorIsIn]

Those two posts aren’t contradictory.

[Steel-W0LF]

@TheDoctorIsIn

Those two posts aren’t contradictory.

Sure there not.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@Steel-W0LF

Sure there not.

They’re not. It’s not complicated.

[conan]

Seems to me were are giving libs here a taste of their own medicine.

[Steel-W0LF]

@TheDoctorIsIn

@Steel-W0LF

Sure there not.

They’re not. It’s not complicated.

Are there any peaceful protestors at the Portland courthouse?

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@Steel-W0LF

Are there any peaceful protestors at the Portland courthouse?

Yes, of course.

[Steel-W0LF]

@TheDoctorIsIn

@Steel-W0LF

Are there any peaceful protestors at the Portland courthouse?

Yes, of course.

Contradiction.

@TheDoctorIsIn

Why would any “innocent” protesters participate in a neo-nazi rally?

[TheDoctorIsIn]

No, that’s not a contradiction. Those two statements can coexist comfortablely.

This is pretty basic stuff here.

[calirepub]

@TheDoctorIsIn

No, that’s not a contradiction.

This is pretty basic stuff here.

I wish you would explain it though. Simple things can be difficult to grasp if they’re not spelled out.

[NebraskaFootball]

@Steel-W0LF

@NebraskaFootball

@Steel-W0LF

@NebraskaFootball

@TheDoctorIsIn

@altair1013

I never provided cover for any right wing thug as the left has done here.

Ahem…

@altair1013

Fake news. He never said there were fine Neo Nazis. You can be opposed to removing a statue and not be a Nazi.

If you can be opposed to removing a statue (at a Nazi rally) and not be a Nazi, then surely you can protest police misconduct and not be deemed “violent” by proxy.

Ouch. That’s going to leave a hypocrisy mark.

Sure will.

Were you guys wrong then or now?

You guys? Show me my posts that are in direct opposition to one another as @TheDoctorIsIn did here and I’ll let you know.

Sure thing.

Here you go:

[quote=“TheDoctorIsIn, post:29, topic:233585, full:true”]If you can be opposed to removing a statue (at a Nazi rally) and not be a Nazi, then surely you can protest police misconduct and not be deemed “violent” by proxy.

@TheDoctorIsIn

Why would any “innocent” protesters participate in a neo-nazi rally?

[/quote]

I don’t see my name anywhere in these posts. What am I missing?

[CanadianJudo]

@Steel-W0LF

@TheDoctorIsIn

@Steel-W0LF

Are there any peaceful protestors at the Portland courthouse?

Yes, of course.

Contradiction.

@TheDoctorIsIn

Why would any “innocent” protesters participate in a neo-nazi rally?

The Portland protest isn’t a ANTFIA protest.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@calirepub

I wish you would explain it though. Simple things can be difficult to grasp if they’re not spelled out.

Ok, I’ll do my best.

I believe there are non-violent protestors in Portland, and I question why a non-Nazi would choose to attend a Nazi rally.

Those two concepts are not mutually exclusive.

[Steel-W0LF]

@TheDoctorIsIn

@calirepub

I wish you would explain it though. Simple things can be difficult to grasp if they’re not spelled out.

Ok, I’ll do my best.

I believe there are non-violent protestors in Portland, and I question why a non-Nazi would choose to attend a Nazi rally.

Those two concepts are not mutually exclusive.

So non violent people can attend a protest by a violent leftist group and not be guilty by association.

But people can’t attend a protest by a violent right wing group without being guilty by association.

Yeah, there’s no contradiction. Makes perfect sense.

[calirepub]

@Steel-W0LF

So non violent people can attend a protest by a violent leftist group

Which group are you referring to?