DOJ creates special unit to target ‘domestic terrorism’

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@CanadianJudo

@Call_me_Ishmael

@CanadianJudo

According to the Constitution states don’t even need to have elections legislatures can just pick electors.

Non sequitur. The point is… the legislatures - no one else- decides.

legislatures delegated their power, then got mad after the election was over trying to remove legally cast ballots.

You can’t DELEGATE to a different branch of government.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@Call_me_Ishmael

@CanadianJudo

@Call_me_Ishmael

@CanadianJudo

According to the Constitution states don’t even need to have elections legislatures can just pick electors.

Non sequitur. The point is… the legislatures - no one else- decides.

legislatures delegated their power, then got mad after the election was over trying to remove legally cast ballots.

You can’t DELEGATE to a different branch of government.

Wow.

I love it when Cons inadvertently reveal that they don’t really know how our government works👍

[zantax]

@CanadianJudo

@zantax

@CanadianJudo

another possible domestic terrorist arrested in CA.

After Posting on Tiktok, CA Man Arrested With AR-15 and Hit List Including Fauci, Obama

During an interrogation by USSS investigators, Xiong expanded on his alleged plans. He wanted to travel to D.C. in order to “combat evil demons in the White House” and “kill persons in power,” according to investigators.

Xiong’s cell phone reportedly showed that he had multiple notes on his calendar application, including “silencer order,” “save USA,” and “rifle pickup.”

Most alarming to USSS officials, however, was an alleged “hit list” compiled of videos from the social media platform TikTok. With nearly 100 videos, the list included prominent Democratic politicians and public figures.

The most notable names on the list included former Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci, and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. Additionally, Xiong stated that he would kill President Biden if he did not comply with his unspecified demands.

Oh scary, he had til tik tok videos. Did those dems put their address on them?

did you miss the part were he confessed he was travelling to DC to murder the President and other Democrats?

Saying and doing are two different things, he would have never gotten. near them most likely.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@Supreme_War_Pig

@Call_me_Ishmael

@CanadianJudo

@Call_me_Ishmael

@CanadianJudo

According to the Constitution states don’t even need to have elections legislatures can just pick electors.

Non sequitur. The point is… the legislatures - no one else- decides.

legislatures delegated their power, then got mad after the election was over trying to remove legally cast ballots.

You can’t DELEGATE to a different branch of government.

Wow.

I love it when Cons inadvertently reveal that they don’t really know how our government works👍

Has nothing to do with how the government works. It has to do with the meaning of the word “delegate” in the English language.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

And you keep doing it. Awesome!

[CanadianJudo]

@Call_me_Ishmael

@CanadianJudo

@Call_me_Ishmael

@CanadianJudo

According to the Constitution states don’t even need to have elections legislatures can just pick electors.

Non sequitur. The point is… the legislatures - no one else- decides.

legislatures delegated their power, then got mad after the election was over trying to remove legally cast ballots.

You can’t DELEGATE to a different branch of government.

sure you can.

Congress delegated Control over DC to the local branch of government.

[CanadianJudo]

@Supreme_War_Pig

@Call_me_Ishmael

@CanadianJudo

@Call_me_Ishmael

@CanadianJudo

According to the Constitution states don’t even need to have elections legislatures can just pick electors.

Non sequitur. The point is… the legislatures - no one else- decides.

legislatures delegated their power, then got mad after the election was over trying to remove legally cast ballots.

You can’t DELEGATE to a different branch of government.

Wow.

I love it when Cons inadvertently reveal that they don’t really know how our government works👍

Republican only took issue with the voting rules AFTER people voted.
not in the months leading up to the election.

they were stopped because you can’t punish people for voting in good faith.

[fallenturtle]

@gooddad409

@fallenturtle

@Eagle-Keeper

@fallenturtle

@Eagle-Keeper

For one, I highly doubt much intensive signature verification goes on, especially in the overcrowded inner cities

Couldn’t that be said about most voting security measures? “I doubt much intensive voter id verification goes on”.

Are you seriously arguing that mail in voting can be made as secure as in person voting? Here’s where I will admit that any type of voting is dependent upon the competency and honesty of the people who work the polls, which NONE of can verify.

Nonetheless, let’s consider an in person voting scenario and a mail in voting scenario. With an in person voting scenario we can require a photo ID and signature verification right in front of a poll worker as the prospective voter signs off on their voter registration. Would that be in your mind a pretty damm secure way to verify that the person on the voter roll is the one who is voting and that person on the roll only will vote once? Please detail how we can have that same level of security with a mail in ballot?

Same level, I don’t know… but there are ways we could make mail-in ballots harder to forge, like a PIN created when you register that you have to use on the ballot or perhaps a finger print. But what’s the point when there’s not an issue with election integrity here in the US?

You guys seriously need to quit swallowing everything TV Man says lock stock and barrel no questions asked.

You guys seriously need to stop assuming we get our information from a TV Man. Just because we believe the Earth is round doesn’t mean we are uninformed.

[Ben_Natuf]

its proof they’re targeting parents who object to crt curriculum

[CanadianJudo]

@Ben_Natuf

its proof they’re targeting parents who object to crt curriculum

They are targeting parents to threaten to kill school officials.

[fallenturtle]

@Ben_Natuf

its proof they’re targeting parents who object to crt curriculum

They are not. If they were there would be a lot more arrests since protests at school boards over CRT have been happening all over the country.

If they were going after “opponents of Biden, democrats, CRT, government overreach & government corruption” it would be obvious because we’d see it happening. There are a lot of “opponents of Biden, democrats, CRT, government overreach & government corruption” out there.

[WuWei]

That’s not true.

[WuWei]

That’s not true either.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@fallenturtle

@gooddad409

@fallenturtle

@Eagle-Keeper

@fallenturtle

@Eagle-Keeper

For one, I highly doubt much intensive signature verification goes on, especially in the overcrowded inner cities

Couldn’t that be said about most voting security measures? “I doubt much intensive voter id verification goes on”.

Are you seriously arguing that mail in voting can be made as secure as in person voting? Here’s where I will admit that any type of voting is dependent upon the competency and honesty of the people who work the polls, which NONE of can verify.

Nonetheless, let’s consider an in person voting scenario and a mail in voting scenario. With an in person voting scenario we can require a photo ID and signature verification right in front of a poll worker as the prospective voter signs off on their voter registration. Would that be in your mind a pretty damm secure way to verify that the person on the voter roll is the one who is voting and that person on the roll only will vote once? Please detail how we can have that same level of security with a mail in ballot?

Same level, I don’t know… but there are ways we could make mail-in ballots harder to forge, like a PIN created when you register that you have to use on the ballot or perhaps a finger print. But what’s the point when there’s not an issue with election integrity here in the US?

You guys seriously need to quit swallowing everything TV Man says lock stock and barrel no questions asked.

You guys seriously need to stop assuming we get our information from a TV Man. Just because we believe the Earth is round doesn’t mean we are uninformed.

You might have a point … if you didn’t believe that women can have penises and men can have babies.

[Ceasar]

@CanadianJudo

@Supreme_War_Pig

@Call_me_Ishmael

@CanadianJudo

@Call_me_Ishmael

@CanadianJudo

According to the Constitution states don’t even need to have elections legislatures can just pick electors.

Non sequitur. The point is… the legislatures - no one else- decides.

legislatures delegated their power, then got mad after the election was over trying to remove legally cast ballots.

You can’t DELEGATE to a different branch of government.

Wow.

I love it when Cons inadvertently reveal that they don’t really know how our government works👍

Republican only took issue with the voting rules AFTER people voted.
not in the months leading up to the election.

they were stopped because you can’t punish people for voting in good faith.

You are Canadian, right? Canadian law is more strict than that.

[Ceasar]

@CanadianJudo

@Ben_Natuf

its proof they’re targeting parents who object to crt curriculum

They are targeting parents to threaten to kill school officials.

Tell that to the parents who threatened nobody but still was targets.

[FreeAndClear]

Coming from somebody who never once questioned it until he lost, this is just so pretty

[Guilds]

@Ceasar

Tell that to the parents who threatened nobody but still was targets.

Whom did this happen to?

[gooddad409]

@fallenturtle

@gooddad409

@fallenturtle

@Eagle-Keeper

@fallenturtle

@Eagle-Keeper

For one, I highly doubt much intensive signature verification goes on, especially in the overcrowded inner cities

Couldn’t that be said about most voting security measures? “I doubt much intensive voter id verification goes on”.

Are you seriously arguing that mail in voting can be made as secure as in person voting? Here’s where I will admit that any type of voting is dependent upon the competency and honesty of the people who work the polls, which NONE of can verify.

Nonetheless, let’s consider an in person voting scenario and a mail in voting scenario. With an in person voting scenario we can require a photo ID and signature verification right in front of a poll worker as the prospective voter signs off on their voter registration. Would that be in your mind a pretty damm secure way to verify that the person on the voter roll is the one who is voting and that person on the roll only will vote once? Please detail how we can have that same level of security with a mail in ballot?

Same level, I don’t know… but there are ways we could make mail-in ballots harder to forge, like a PIN created when you register that you have to use on the ballot or perhaps a finger print. But what’s the point when there’s not an issue with election integrity here in the US?

You guys seriously need to quit swallowing everything TV Man says lock stock and barrel no questions asked.

You guys seriously need to stop assuming we get our information from a TV Man. Just because we believe the Earth is round doesn’t mean we are uninformed.

Oh we know where you guys are getting your misinformation. CNN, MsNBC, Wahpo, NY times, and oh yes the alphabet networks.

Most of those guys wouldn’t tell the truth if their lives depended on it.

Plus they don’t even report anything bad for the dem party hardly ever. Omission of news is about as bad as outright lies.

[Guilds]

@gooddad409

Oh we know where you guys are getting your misinformation . CNN, MsNBC, Wahpo, NY times, and oh yes the alphabet networks.

Most of those guys wouldn’t tell the truth if their lives depended on it.

Plus they don’t even report anything bad for the dem party hardly ever. Omission of news is about as bad as outright lies.

All of those are corporate media. Their motive is is to make money, for their corporate shareholders. (see CBS CEO comments on covering Trump).

There is no left version of FOX news, or OAN, or Think tanks, or 1000’s of radio stations promoting the RW narrative.

This myth that today’s media is liberal, and/or caters to the “left” is a fantasy.