I don’t. Stop wanting to get more money without doing more.
FreeAndClear: WuWei: FreeAndClear:Pay them more.
Look in the driveway.
Pay them more. Oh and Stop berating people for choosing to get more money.
I don’t. Stop wanting to get more money without doing more.
Doing more is pretty subjective. Paying them more while actively engaging in quality control of the work product produces better work product. But that’s my little anecdote. I don’t know if it’s true for other small businesses.
Doing more is pretty subjective.
It absolutely is. And the opinion of just one person counts.
Cratic3947:Ok, Then why are you complaining about the govt subsidizing Wall street, when you support it?
I am not. You funny. I am pointing out that you guys individually and collectively only care when dems are in power.
I can say it again for the cheap seats. Both sides spend money. One side spends money like a drunken sailor and is open about it while the other spending money like a drunken sailor except they are vehemently against both being a drunk and a sailor.
It’s not both sides bad. The side that does it Ans complains about is worse.
Does this mean you now support smaller govt? And therefore less corporate cronyism?
Paying them more while actively engaging in quality control of the work product produces better work product.
Which may or may not be real value added.
Here you go. You are welcome btw
Not completely happy, but I can support the 1.5 trillion stimulus proposal - #28 by Cratic3947
Yes, Trumps a moderate. And antiwar… Unlike Bombing Biden who doesn’t care who he kills as long as it changes the news cycle…
I’m all for it. As long as it’s not means checked. I want the same as the bum that doesn’t want to work.
The one in Alaska is not.
Allan
Bombing Biden
Who withdrew the troops from harms way in Afghanistan.
Allan
Equality not equity!
The people in Alaska all get their direct payment.
Allan
JFK was a huge opponent and wanted rid of the Fed. Although I doubt he would make it in today’s Democratic Party he was a Democrat and against the Fed,
Wasn’t just libertarians for sound money at one point at least.
How much per person would be netted by dividing up oil lease profits on federal land to every American?
Indeed.
The majority of the profits from treasures that are derived from our natural resources, should go towards the American people.
That includes the many industries the American people subsidize, for initial R&D that then become very profitable products or services.
Clearly, given the continued labor shortage despite the growing number of people no longer receiving unemployment. Maybe there’s a bit more to it than “people getting paid more to sit on their ass.”
Here in N CA, In & Out pays $20.90/ hour, starting wage. GM can make up to 150k.
In many European countries, Fast Food pays a living wage, and they are still quite profitable.
Prices are a bit more…but still relatively low.
FreeAndClear:Here you go. You are welcome btw
Not completely happy, but I can support the 1.5 trillion stimulus proposal - #28 by Cratic3947
Yes, Trumps a moderate. And antiwar… Unlike Bombing Biden who doesn’t care who he kills as long as it changes the news cycle…
Thanks for switching topics. Good on you.
JFK was a huge opponent and wanted rid of the Fed. Although I doubt he would make it in today’s Democratic Party he was a Democrat and against the Fed,
Wasn’t just libertarians for sound money at one point at least.
Do you agree with a fiat monetary system? Or just do not like the Fed?
Cratic3947:Bombing Biden
Who withdrew the troops from harms way in Afghanistan.
Allan
Trump
FreeAndClear: Cratic3947:Ok, Then why are you complaining about the govt subsidizing Wall street, when you support it?
I am not. You funny. I am pointing out that you guys individually and collectively only care when dems are in power.
I can say it again for the cheap seats. Both sides spend money. One side spends money like a drunken sailor and is open about it while the other spending money like a drunken sailor except they are vehemently against both being a drunk and a sailor.
It’s not both sides bad. The side that does it Ans complains about is worse.
Does this mean you now support smaller govt? And therefore less corporate cronyism?
I am not sure how free marketers can be against corporate cronyism. It’s part and parcel of human nature. The same human nature that allegedly strives for free markets while at the same time relying on the government to financially assist it. Quite the con job.
You can’t spell conservative without the con.
Toll_Collector:I’m all for it. As long as it’s not means checked. I want the same as the bum that doesn’t want to work.
The one in Alaska is not.
Allan
The one in Alaska is not what? Not that I give a damn about what Alaska does. I don’t live there.
wiley8425:Clearly, given the continued labor shortage despite the growing number of people no longer receiving unemployment. Maybe there’s a bit more to it than “people getting paid more to sit on their ass.”
Here in N CA, In & Out pays $20.90/ hour, starting wage. GM can make up to 150k.
In many European countries, Fast Food pays a living wage, and they are still quite profitable.
Prices are a bit more…but still relatively low.
A living wage is garbage. And what do you mean by a living wage? Does that consider dependents? Living wage or not, you’re still broke.
If the wage doesn’t matter, why can’t people raise families on the minimum? If wages kept pace with production, a lot of people wouldn’t be making anything close to minimum wage.