Didn't see that coming: Russia and US to work together on Clinton $$$ and Emails!

[BlueTex]

@zantax

Well I do, and there is no way to know a copy matches the original without access to the original. Want to see everything on my computer? I’ll send you a copy and you tell me if it’s really a copy or not.

Are you suggesting the FBI seizes computers in cyber breach cases they investigate each year?

[DOLOOP]

@BlueTex

@zantax

Well I do, and there is no way to know a copy matches the original without access to the original. Want to see everything on my computer? I’ll send you a copy and you tell me if it’s really a copy or not.

Are you suggesting the FBI seizes computers in cyber breach cases they investigate each year?

Kind of a weird notion. How do organizations continue business as usual if the FBI is grabbing the hardware?

[wiley8425]

Apparently at least some of them.

FBI seizes computers from Camden County Courthouse, employees suspended

[Piper]

@BornAgainChristian

The Helsinki Question and Answer phase, just ended minutes ago. A reporter asked about collusion, Russia has a Treaty with the us on crime and wants investigation into the illegal money that went to Clintons.

They also will work together in both Russia and US to find those Emails, inspect the DNC server, etc etc.

Its a boomerang of King Kong proportions.

400 million to the Clintons. :

[TheDoctorIsIn]

From who? For what?

When? How?

[Piper]

@TheDoctorIsIn

From who? For what?

When? How?

From Putin’s mouth. Weren’t you listening?

[adroit]

@Piper

@TheDoctorIsIn

From who? For what?

When? How?

From Putin’s mouth. Weren’t you listening?

Bless your precious heart.

[BlueTex]

@Piper

400 million to the Clintons. :

Was this to the Clinton Foundation? If so, can you show us where this appears in their 990 tax filing?

[BornAgainChristian]

@adroit

@BornAgainChristian

That’s gross incompetence, or collusion.

^- doesn’t understand technology.

Hearsay isn’t acceptable in court of law for excellent reason, its hearsay.

[BlueTex]

@BornAgainChristian

Hearsay isn’t acceptable in court of law for excellent reason, its hearsay.

Are network logs hearsay? Can a vendor testify to the veracity of evidence? Don’t quit your day job…

[madasheck]

@BornAgainChristian

@Camp

Not going to get my hopes up too much…

Certainly is an interesting twist, especially if Russia got the muddy end of the stick on taxes in the deal.

Attorney General can’t ignore this. Especially if Russia demands and investigation.

Why is the attorney general beholden to Russia?

[madasheck]

@BornAgainChristian

@GrandWazoo

@BornAgainChristian

Spin will not save the DNC.

Deflection won’t work.

The spin and deflection was all coming from Trump. When asked about Russian interference in our election he immediately went to Clinton and the server. Trump has no concept how this effects the American people. He only cares how it impacts him. The Mueller investigation is not just about him. But he would have you believe it. He is not a man for the people. He is a man for himself. And it is just amazing to me how Trump supporters can not see the obvious. Just sad.

Because the Server is where the facts are. That’s not spin, its a call for the DNC server to be inspected by FBI experts, not a private concern.

The indictments of the Twelve are based on hearsay evidence, what “cloud strike” claimed. Their claims of accuracy have been successfully contradicted.

Stupid conspiracy theories aren’t facts. And they never will be.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

I understand that “cause Putin said so” is enough evidence for you, but that’s not what I’m asking.

I mean, who gave this money to the Clintons? How did they give it? Did they just write a check to Bill and Hillary? Did they donate it to the Foundation? Hillary’s campaign? What purpose did the money serve?

Most importantly, how does Putin know all this?

[BornAgainChristian]

@BlueTex

@Piper

400 million to the Clintons. :

Was this to the Clinton Foundation? If so, can you show us where this appears in their 990 tax filing?

Putin said the 1B wasn’t taxed by Russia or US (therefore, illegal to transfer it), out that Clinton Global Initiative got 400 mill and Putin wonders why. This is asked at a Summit, it can’t be dismissed, deflected or ignored.

Frame 29:00 Treaty, Frame 31 Clinton $$$

[zantax]

@BlueTex

@zantax

Well I do, and there is no way to know a copy matches the original without access to the original. Want to see everything on my computer? I’ll send you a copy and you tell me if it’s really a copy or not.

Are you suggesting the FBI seizes computers in cyber breach cases they investigate each year?

Nope, I am saying it is best practice to get direct access to them just as Comey said. Which is why the FBI requested it repeatedly.

[BlueTex]

@BornAgainChristian

Putin said the 1B wasn’t taxed by Russia or US (therefore, illegal to transfer it), out that Clinton Global Initiative got 400 mill and Putin wonders why. This is asked at a Summit, it can’t be dismissed, deflected or ignored.

Frame 29:00 Treaty, Frame 31 Clinton $$$

Can you show us on their 990 where this $400 million is recorded?

[zantax]

@BlueTex

@BornAgainChristian

Hearsay isn’t acceptable in court of law for excellent reason, its hearsay.

Are network logs hearsay? Can a vendor testify to the veracity of evidence? Don’t quit your day job…

You should read up on chain of custody in digital based cases, you can start here

https://www.govtechworks.com/chain-of-custody-how-to-ensure-digital-evidence-stands-up-in-court/

[BornAgainChristian]

@zantax

@BlueTex

@BornAgainChristian

Hearsay isn’t acceptable in court of law for excellent reason, its hearsay.

Are network logs hearsay? Can a vendor testify to the veracity of evidence? Don’t quit your day job…

You should read up on chain of custody in digital based cases, you can start here

https://www.govtechworks.com/chain-of-custody-how-to-ensure-digital-evidence-stands-up-in-court/

The FBI never inspected the Server for chain of custody to exist. A private concern’s report isn’t it.

[BornAgainChristian]

@BornAgainChristian

@zantax

@BlueTex

@BornAgainChristian

Hearsay isn’t acceptable in court of law for excellent reason, its hearsay.

Are network logs hearsay? Can a vendor testify to the veracity of evidence? Don’t quit your day job…

You should read up on chain of custody in digital based cases, you can start here

https://www.govtechworks.com/chain-of-custody-how-to-ensure-digital-evidence-stands-up-in-court/

The FBI never inspected the Server for chain of custody to exist. A private concern’s report isn’t it.

That’s to Blue Tex.

Hearsay is not evidence. That private firm is not law enforcement follow legal rules for gathering and documenting evidence.

[ZeroBravoPorkchop]

Anyone cheering what took place today needs to question their loyalty to America.