I remember the so-called moderate candidate running against Ahmadinejad saying as for the Israel question we only need one bomb anyway to deal with that. And that was from the so-called moderate candidate we were hoping would win.
Israel has long had a policy of assassination against leaders who are viewed as a threat to Israeli security. What makes us think that this policy has only been limited to leaders in Iran, Hezbollah, Hammas, etc.?
President Kennedy and Israeli PM Ben Gurion go into bitter disputes over the Israeli nuclear program that was conducting tests at Dimona at the same time Kennedy was attempting to get agreement on a nuclear test ban treaty. The dispute is documented in a series of letters from 1963 that have since been declassified.
Here is what one historian says about the dispute:
Forget Lyndon Johnson, forget the CIA, forget Fidel Castro, the Mossad killed Kennedy because they were so upset over what he did Ben Gurion . . .–historian Martin Sandler https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9h41rc (see video starting at 2:00)
You know a side is losing when it intentionally targets civilian population centers rather than military targets. Iran is currently targeting Tel Aviv with missiles. A big mistake in my opinion.
But if Washington DC were being attacked, do you believe the sitting President would remain in the WH or do you believe he would be flying somewhere on Air Force One? Wouldn’t it make sense for the Israeli prime minister to do the same?
They don’t have the confidence in their own equipment to actually hit pin point military targets. Getting a cruise missile or a ballistic missile, even with a terrible accuracy rating, to hit a city sized target is easy. Hitting something like an actual military building is difficult.