Only a crime???
obuma has committed a lot of crimes, letting ISIS emerge and then supporting it the most serious probably
I kept all of mine too.
It’s your story, tell it any way you want. I wish Trump would not tweet so much too. Maybe we agree with more than we disagree.
By the way Dan Bongino’s book is due out soon.
What do you think about, ‘Calexit’ supporters revamping their campaign with plan to convert half of California into an ‘autonomous Native American nation?’
It wasn’t a failed state and haven for AQ or ISIS.
That is of course flatly false on it’s face.
Neither was Iraq until we overthrew Saddam, but it took about 10 years for you guys to finally admit that, or are you still bitterly clinging to the invasion of Iraq being a good idea?
You asked and I answered.
From earlier:
Also from earlier:
Republicans claimed the IRS served as an attack dog for the Obama White House. But inquiries by the House Ways and Means Committee, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations and the Justice Department all failed to produce evidence of political interference
What’s more, none of the groups actually needed IRS approval to operate. “These organizations didn’t have to wait for the IRS to tell them anything to go into business,” Koskinen said in a telephone interview last week.
Yet the IRS clearly applied extra scrutiny to groups that it thought might be engaged in too much politics to warrant the preferential tax designation. One way IRS personnel did that was to look for key words, such as “Tea Party.” Other words that triggered IRS scrutiny included: “Occupy,” “green energy,” “medical marijuana” and “progressive.”
Contrary to the Republican story, the IRS never targeted conservatives. The IRS targeted politics, which was pretty much what it was supposed to do.
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-11-20/gop-surrenders-cherished-irs-scandal-at-last
For those who might have blissfully forgotten the details of this particular non-scandal, this all began when an earlier TIGTA report in 2013 addressed an inquiry from Republicans in Congress about whether the IRS was using politicized criteria when reviewing applications for a particular kind of tax-exempt status.
To qualify for that status, an organization cannot engage in political activities. At least, that is what the law says, with the relevant tax code provision ( section 501(c)(4) ) saying that organizations that are “operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare” are eligible for tax-exempt status.
Now, we have proof that the first prong of the non-scandal was never true. The IRS did use politically-oriented search terms to try to sort through applicants for inappropriate levels of political activity, but it did not do so on a partisan or ideological basis. And even so, they stopped using those search terms, in an effort to avoid even the appearance of political intent in their reviews.
So you think Libya was better off pre-Qaddafi than it is today?
For the betterment of the citizenry. Do you have a problem with that?
I’m certain you have proof of that statement, otherwise you wouldn’t have posted it. Care to share it with us?
Is collusion an impeachable offense?
“Someone” should pay for it? Didn’t Donnie Dollhands say “Mexico will pay for it:”? Who do YOU think should “pay for it”?
Libs … giving away someone else’s property. Very charitable.
1 Like
Great man (two men).
Please share with us some examples of the “lively political debate” you have engaged in that didn’t include nasty comments about the philosophies about people who include contrary opinions.
We’ll wait.
While you wait… re read the post. Pay attention these things " " " " "
They indicate that someone else - actual or hypothetical- is speaking .
Who the ■■■■ cares, Lib
You got that right, Bro. They are pickpockets
