It’s completely provable she set it up to exchange her emails outside of the proper secured channels.
How are you going to do that given that none of the emails on her server had proper classified markings?
Apparently you didn’t read anything I posted.
Not on their state.gov email addresses. That is not a classified system.
I thought so too but your reply stated to mention FOIA and wandered on to cyber security rather than deal with the case law that I had referenced.
All of the material in these messages was taken from it’s proper place and sent via her unsecured email.
The latest batch of emails released from Hillary Clinton’s personal account from her tenure as secretary of state includes 66 messages deemed classified at some level, the State Department said early Friday. In one email, Clinton even seemed to coach a top adviser on how to send secure information outside secure channels. Clinton, the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination, has repeatedly maintained that she did not send or receive classified material on her personal account. The State Department claims none of the emails now marked classified were labled as such at the time they were sent. However, one email thread from June 2011 appears to include Clinton telling her top adviser Jake Sullivan to send secure information through insecure means. In response to Clinton’s request for a set of since-redacted talking points, Sullivan writes, “They say they’ve had issues sending secure fax. They’re working on it.” Clinton responds “If they can’t, turn into nonpaper [with] no identifying heading and send nonsecure.” Ironically, an email thread from four months earlier shows Clinton saying she was “surprised” that a diplomatic oficer named John Godfrey used a personal email account to send a memo on Libya policy after the fall of Muammar Qaddafi.
There is no question at all about the particular message cited here in which she directed her aide to remove the classified headers and send via unsecure email.
They have a classified system for such messages. She sent and received them outside of same.
Not only was she guilty of doing so, so too were those sending her the information.
I love you too say “there is no question” as if that actually means anything.
Turn it into a non-paper means strip the classified information out. Regardless, the fax was never sent so there could be no “question” that the law was broken without a fax being sent.
The material was not “taken” from its proper place. It was originated entirely outside the classified information system.
Of course it was taken from it’s proper place. You are twisting yourself into knots here.
If you take a document from it’s proper scan, copy, or otherwise reproduce and email it you have done just that.
Whether the aide complied, she ordered it showing she absolutely lied when claiming she had no knowledge of the marking systems.
“If they can’t, turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure.” That’s an order to violate the laws handling classified material. There is no other way to read that demand. Regardless of whether or not Sullivan complied, this demolishes Hillary’s claim to be ignorant of marking issues, as well as strongly suggests that the other thousand-plus instances where this did occur likely came under her direction.
There is no doubt then that she knew what she was doing or her intent.
She never claimed to have no knowledge of classified marking system.
What law are you going to prosecute her under for this offense?
She certainly did, read the quote again. That alone would justify a conviction on perjury.
As for the rest, any prosecutor that could not successfully indict and convict her under the other statute needs to be unemployed.
She never claimed to have no knowledge of classification markings and you know it. If you can prove otherwise, do so.
What “other statute” does this prove she violated and how, soliciter?
She certainly did when testifying before congress, that’s what Gowdy was addressing.
Read the whole article for yourself.
Provide the quote where she claimed she had no knowledge of classified markings or admit that one doesn’t exist.
You’re over reliance on crappy right wing blogs for factual information is a huge weakness.
1 Like
Admit that it doesn’t exist? I gave you the source if you can show Gowdy is lying do so.
That may be your weakest defense of Hillary yet, and that’s really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
You gave me no such source. Provide the quote please.
Using crappy right wing blogs has caused you embarrassment in the past. You’d think you’d learn.
Was the fax ever sent unsecured?
No.
Something your crappy bloggers never learned. Which is why they’re factually incorrect.
