Why would they? Comey recommended no charges be brought. Lynch followed the director’s recommendation because she was compromised. Why didn’t Obama replace Lynch who was “compromised?” Wasn’t Obama the head of the executive branch? Why would Congress be in charge of making sure the AG prosecuted Hillary for breaking the law? Are they part of the Executive branch now?
mmkay
Snow complains that Dems want to get out in front of the report and spin their narrative, but doesn’t seem to be too upset with Rs being able to spin their narrative.
Both sides just want to spin their version of the report, so what makes either “side” “better” in this situation?
Snow debunked his own narrative by complaining about a narrative being spun while the side he agrees with spins its own narrative.
theres no narrative being spin except by the desperate left and cnn media screw-niverse
You didn’t post this because it sure look like you’re saying she thought she was guilty?
Well that’s just not true at all, but it’s also not the point. I’ve already been over this with someone else.
The point is that Snow is upset that opposition wanted to get their version of what the report says out first before his “side” can get theirs out. Neither side holds a moral high ground or prerogative here.
Obama has been gone from the Presidency for over 26 months. Trump has been President for over the last 26 months with the Republicans running the DOJ. IF Hillary is really guilty, the Republican run DOJ could have already indicted her sometime during the last 26 months.
Spin, spin, spin. What people should be doing is reading the full report, not getting Barr’s fake assessment (or anyone else’s). That’s what the Dems have been calling for. But curiously, Reps have been satisfied with Barr’s Cliff Notes version. Which ain’t the way it reads, amirite? 
No, just the fake ones. And the fake posts.
#fakepost
Of course. That doesn’t change the fact that Obama was head of the Executive branch when the crime actually occurred and not Trump or the GOP though, now does it?
Maybe we should only allow libs to make threads…would that be better for you?
Why do you think liberal republicans would want her indicted? Most of them were opposed to Trump. The American people chose him. Not the politicians. The politicians are more interested in putting on a show. Now that the DOJ is finally in competent hands expect some more info to be revealed.
1 Like
Nor does it change the fact that Trump has been President for over the last 26 months with the Republicans running the DOJ. And done nothing about Hillary.
1 Like
Thanks, Captain Obvious. Once again, you completely missed the point. But sure, let’s continue talking about the earlier deflection from it. 
Yeah…I know.
He did not say there was no obstruction. Fact.
So you’re saying that the Liberals can’t necessarily control Americans and tell
people how to think and feel on this one?
Well, that’s not “fair”. Whine, whine, whine, whine, whine. lol.
“Not sufficient” does not mean “not there”. Not even close.
No. We would run out of peas.
1 Like
Their spin only works if you listen to it in the first place.
