Not if they want to play the judge activist game, no.
SixFoot:That was the plan, remember?
Wouldn’t a better plan to have centrist type of judges? I do not want extreme ideological judges from either side.
You’re telling me you don’t want judges to rule in the liberal way every time?
LucyLou: Steel-W0LF:Yup. One of your liberal brethren on this board advocates gassing people and seizing their firearms by force. I won’t name him as a callout, but he posts a LOT.
I think it would be ok to name someone who advocates gassing people. That’s horrific.
He’s spoken in this thread.
I rarely post or read gun threads. So I’m sorry I don’t really know.
Impeaching Presidents for winning
Liberals and democrats were pretty ticked how W Bush got elected, and how he governed. He also did some pretty shady things…but it never came close to him being impeached. Trump pushed the line of presidential powers well over the threshold of being acceptable.
It has been said many times…but if Obama had done what Trump has done…R’s would have impeached him faster than a light particle.
Liberals and democrats were pretty ticked how W Bush got elected, and how he governed. He also did some pretty shady things…but it never came close to him being impeached.
Libs also supported Dubya Boosh when he reincarnated as Obama. lol
mobulis: LucyLou: Steel-W0LF:Yup. One of your liberal brethren on this board advocates gassing people and seizing their firearms by force. I won’t name him as a callout, but he posts a LOT.
I think it would be ok to name someone who advocates gassing people. That’s horrific.
Not poison just knock out.
Good thing no one ever dies under anesthesia, right?
@mobulis I have to think you’re goosing people, but geezus that is horrific and counter-productive. Why?
There are different ways that judges can rule in court cases and, contrary to what you might believe, you are not always right. Not every liberal argument is right and not every conservative argument is right.
If you put in judge that will side with you regardless of what the constitution (state or federal) says, you are not running the government well.
Respectfully disagree.
The majority of gun owners are responsible.
Having limits and regulations complies with the constitution.
You’re telling me you don’t want judges to rule in the liberal way every time?
I personally would prefer that. But I do not want extreme liberal judges making that call.
A more centrist judge would look at all sides, then judge accordingly. If the decision went liberal, good. It it went conservative, so be it.
Why wouldn’t they think that when a state representative says they will call in the national guard, he’s reinforcing every negative stereotype about government taking your guns.
Why wouldn’t they think that when a state representative says they will call in the national guard, he’s reinforcing every negative stereotype about government taking your guns.
Maybe when Marshall law is invoked, that may happen.
But if Marshall law is invoked…we have much more serious problems.
Mountain_Soldier: mobulis: LucyLou: Steel-W0LF:Yup. One of your liberal brethren on this board advocates gassing people and seizing their firearms by force. I won’t name him as a callout, but he posts a LOT.
I think it would be ok to name someone who advocates gassing people. That’s horrific.
Not poison just knock out.
Good thing no one ever dies under anesthesia, right?
@mobulis I have to think you’re goosing people, but geezus that is horrific and counter-productive. Why?
Posters stated that even if guns were banned you couldn’t take them all, you can and that’s how simple.
Really? how many, what type and where are my guns? Hint not one is registered.
Posters stated that even if guns were banned you couldn’t take them all, you can and that’s how simple.
You literally can’t do that. It’s illegal, horrific, dangerous, and stupid to contemplate.
mobulis:Posters stated that even if guns were banned you couldn’t take them all, you can and that’s how simple.
You literally can’t do that. It’s illegal, horrific, dangerous, and stupid to contemplate.
All true, and it would work.
Really? how many, what type and where are my guns? Hint not one is registered.
There’s this thing people can do called looking.
And what has Trump done again?
Steel-W0LF:Isn’t hypocrisy grand?
Dems in Virginia threaten to pull funding to 70 areas of the state that have declared themselves 2nd amendment sanctuaries, and refuse to enforce new gun laws.
It’s odd that when the shoe is on the other foot they threaten the same things they claimed were illegal punishments concerning immigration sanctuary cities.
It is endlessly amazing how a comment by one Democratic legislator is escalated in the headline into “Dems threaten”. Where does this level of insecurity come from. You would think people with guns believe they are able to protect themselves, but it appears guns don’t solve that problem!
What MAGNIFICENT post!
Axxowiz:Why wouldn’t they think that when a state representative says they will call in the national guard, he’s reinforcing every negative stereotype about government taking your guns.
Maybe when Marshall law is invoked, that may happen.
But if Marshall law is invoked…we have much more serious problems.
Who the hell is Marshall?