Democrats emulating the Russians

[ImRightYoureWrong]

@Mountain_Soldier

Isn’t that the point of these investigations? So it’s ok to use their tactics?

Mueller isnt investigating the morality of running social media campaigns

[ImRightYoureWrong]

@Mountain_Soldier

Isn’t that the point of these investigations? So it’s ok to use their tactics?

Do you believe the Russians affected votes? You’re dodging. .

[ImRightYoureWrong]

@DOLOOP

Do you think Americans have more of a problem with the what of the Russian tactics or The Who?

Hint, the answer is that Russians shouldn’t be participating in our elections.

Just like it’s ok for Americans to contribute money to American campaigns, but not OK for Russians and especially the Russian ■■■■■■■ GRU.

I hope this helps.

Strange that this needs explaining

[ImRightYoureWrong]

@vaard

Like constant blatant lies and using illegal funds

And paying off porn stars

[DOLOOP]

This thread didn’t turn out so well.

Feels like, I dunno, an impulsive Syria pullout decision.

[ImRightYoureWrong]

C’mon dont you know that everyone was upset because like generally people in general were like using the internet and tv and media to run political ads and messages. Just like…generally speaking you know. That’s what Mueller is generally investigating.

[Blackwolf]

That is a patently false accusation. Democrats might TRY and emulate the Russians but they will never be able to manipulate Donald the way Putin has.

[calirepub]

@Mountain_Soldier

Do you support laws against these types of tactics?

[ImRightYoureWrong]

Obama Was Too Good at Social Media

#lockhimup

[LouC]

@Mountain_Soldier

https://nyti.ms/2GtEkuw

Any foreign intervention in an election should be punished. But for the sanctimonious Democrats who decry Russian tactics, they apparently have no problem using those same tactics.

Of note in the article is that the project was funded by one of the co-founders of LinkedIn.

What do the resident liberals say, is this acceptable?

Acceptable? Sure, why not, it was apparently a singular minor experiment in one election only, plus there was no evidence that it had any real effect on the outcome of that particular election, and there does not seem to be a shred of any evidence that any election laws were broken.

It did yield informative results, we the people know about the whole thing, so yeah, I am ok with it.

[Mountain_Soldier]

@LouC

@Mountain_Soldier

https://nyti.ms/2GtEkuw

Any foreign intervention in an election should be punished. But for the sanctimonious Democrats who decry Russian tactics, they apparently have no problem using those same tactics.

Of note in the article is that the project was funded by one of the co-founders of LinkedIn.

What do the resident liberals say, is this acceptable?

Acceptable? Sure, why not, it was apparently a singular minor experiment in one election only, plus there was no evidence that it had any real effect on the outcome of that particular election, and there does not seem to be a shred of any evidence that any election laws were broken.

It did yield informative results, we the people know about the whole thing, so yeah, I am ok with it.

After the fact, people know about it. Cool. Hope the Republicans start playing like that. Small experiment, but it worked. Larger scale next time?

[calirepub]

@Mountain_Soldier

@LouC

@Mountain_Soldier

https://nyti.ms/2GtEkuw

Any foreign intervention in an election should be punished. But for the sanctimonious Democrats who decry Russian tactics, they apparently have no problem using those same tactics.

Of note in the article is that the project was funded by one of the co-founders of LinkedIn.

What do the resident liberals say, is this acceptable?

Acceptable? Sure, why not, it was apparently a singular minor experiment in one election only, plus there was no evidence that it had any real effect on the outcome of that particular election, and there does not seem to be a shred of any evidence that any election laws were broken.

It did yield informative results, we the people know about the whole thing, so yeah, I am ok with it.

After the fact, people know about it. Cool. Hope the Republicans start playing like that. Small experiment, but it worked. Larger scale next time?

Do you support laws against this type of thing?

What’s your solution?

[Mountain_Soldier]

@calirepub

@Mountain_Soldier

@LouC

@Mountain_Soldier

https://nyti.ms/2GtEkuw

Any foreign intervention in an election should be punished. But for the sanctimonious Democrats who decry Russian tactics, they apparently have no problem using those same tactics.

Of note in the article is that the project was funded by one of the co-founders of LinkedIn.

What do the resident liberals say, is this acceptable?

Acceptable? Sure, why not, it was apparently a singular minor experiment in one election only, plus there was no evidence that it had any real effect on the outcome of that particular election, and there does not seem to be a shred of any evidence that any election laws were broken.

It did yield informative results, we the people know about the whole thing, so yeah, I am ok with it.

After the fact, people know about it. Cool. Hope the Republicans start playing like that. Small experiment, but it worked. Larger scale next time?

Do you support laws against this type of thing?

What’s your solution?

Hey, if Democrats are ok with it, I hope republicans do it on a scale of orders of magnitude.

[DOLOOP]

@Mountain_Soldier

@LouC

@Mountain_Soldier

https://nyti.ms/2GtEkuw

Any foreign intervention in an election should be punished. But for the sanctimonious Democrats who decry Russian tactics, they apparently have no problem using those same tactics.

Of note in the article is that the project was funded by one of the co-founders of LinkedIn.

What do the resident liberals say, is this acceptable?

Acceptable? Sure, why not, it was apparently a singular minor experiment in one election only, plus there was no evidence that it had any real effect on the outcome of that particular election, and there does not seem to be a shred of any evidence that any election laws were broken.

It did yield informative results, we the people know about the whole thing, so yeah, I am ok with it.

After the fact, people know about it. Cool. Hope the Republicans start playing like that. Small experiment, but it worked. Larger scale next time?

“Start playing”? It is to laugh.

Wikileaks and the GRU already did it for you in the last Presidential election.

[calirepub]

@Mountain_Soldier

Hey, if Democrats are ok with it, I hope republicans do it on a scale of orders of magnitude.

Republicans seem to have no problem coordinating their efforts with Russians who are employing these methods on a large scale. Honestly, I would rather Republicans do it themselves rather than working with a hostile foreign power.

[LouC]

@Mountain_Soldier

@calirepub

@Mountain_Soldier

@LouC

@Mountain_Soldier

https://nyti.ms/2GtEkuw

Any foreign intervention in an election should be punished. But for the sanctimonious Democrats who decry Russian tactics, they apparently have no problem using those same tactics.

Of note in the article is that the project was funded by one of the co-founders of LinkedIn.

What do the resident liberals say, is this acceptable?

Acceptable? Sure, why not, it was apparently a singular minor experiment in one election only, plus there was no evidence that it had any real effect on the outcome of that particular election, and there does not seem to be a shred of any evidence that any election laws were broken.

It did yield informative results, we the people know about the whole thing, so yeah, I am ok with it.

After the fact, people know about it. Cool. Hope the Republicans start playing like that. Small experiment, but it worked. Larger scale next time?

Do you support laws against this type of thing?

What’s your solution?

Hey, if Democrats are ok with it, I hope republicans do it on a scale of orders of magnitude.

They already did, it is now known as the 2016 Presidential Election of Republican Donald Trump.

[ImRightYoureWrong]

Another classic whataboutism thread

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@DOLOOP

This thread didn’t turn out so well.

It is perfect for showing the left running away from the truth that shows the institutional deception that has been used by them recently.

Why can’t a leftist poster here defend this deception?

[ImRightYoureWrong]

@Call_me_Ishmael

It is perfect for showing the left running away from the truth that shows the institutional deception that has been used by them recently.

Why can’t a leftist poster here defend this deception?

No ones defending deception. We’re laughing at trumpist false outrage and whataboutism

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@ImRightYoureWrong

whataboutism

Whataboutism =
Integrity check

And don’t even try mentioning tu quoque fallacies. We are not trying to disprove anything. Just checking for hypocrisy… seeing if there is integrity on the left. So fallacies are not applicable.