No. If I was, it wouldn’t be a strawman.
New timeliness for 2022.
You may apply for employment authorization 150 days after you file your asylum application instead of waiting 365 days.
You may file a Form I-765 based on your pending asylum application 150 days after you file your asylum application. You are not eligible to receive an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) until your asylum application has been pending for a total of 180 days. The 150-day waiting period and the 180-day eligibility period, commonly referred to as the 180-Day Asylum EAD Clock, do not include delays that you request or cause while your asylum application is pending with an asylum office or with the immigration court.
USCIS Stopped Applying June 2020 Rules Pursuant to Court Order in Asylumworks v. Mayorkas | USCIS.
So not a year now but still have to wait 180 days.
You are still wrong. You should look at the requirements not just read a headline.
1 Like
Sanctuary cities are part of the problem
There is a lot of data out there that proves Sanctuary Cities are safer then non-Sanctuary Cities.
Yet SC’s being bad is still a negative talking point for the Republicans.
Again.
You don’t know what you’re talking about. It appears you learned something, but not enough. They haven’t been granted asylum. According to the Brandonites, they won’t be.
So no work and no green card.
Keep a civil tongue in your head when addressing me.
1 Like
As are you, since you claimed a year.
You should look at the requirements not just read a headline.
I read the document provided by the justice department… the headline, “Employment Rights and Resources for Refugees and Asylees” doesn’t tell me anything. It’s just a headline.
It just changed a few months ago genius. At least I admitted it. You still won’t.
That article is just a headline. It doesn’t get into the requirements.
1 Like
I did admit it, genius, when I said we’re both wrong.
The headline and the body of an article are not the same thing, genius.
Yes it is when you have a talking paper. It is basically a heading you are reading.
Hold up, I just looked more at what you posted and we’re not even talking about the same thing. Your link seems to be in regards to people who have applied for asylum and are still waiting for approval. Mine is regarding people who have already been granted asylum .
You don’t know what I’m talking about. You seem to think you can decide what I’m talking about.
According to the Brandonites, they won’t be.
Stop listening to your luggage.
You can apply for a work permit after 150 days. You can’t apply for a green card until you’ve been granted asylum + 1 year.
Civility is a two way street. If you aren’t civil with me I won’t be civil with you.
Shouldn’t immigrants have to go through the same process (time length) regardless of their geographical location to the U.S.
The word refugee has been expanded or at the very least applied to everyone illegally crossing the border. At some point Americans need to come first or the democrats will get soundly beat in politics regardless of the SC stupid decision on abortion. I was looking at the top issues economy-inflation and while immigration was only 6% abortion was 4%.
It would be better for everyone if they stayed in they country they are in until the asylum process runs it’s course. If they are fleeing war that’s different.
Sure, but many don’t and so we have to deal with it.
I’m not sure its expanded, but perhaps its too vague? I need to read up more on it.
At some point Americans need to come first or the democrats will get soundly beat in politics regardless of the SC stupid decision on abortion. I was looking at the top issues economy-inflation and while immigration was only 6% abortion was 4%.
Not so sure about that. Illegal immigration has been a hot button topic off and on for decades but Democrats continue to win. And then lose. And then win… and so on. I suspect if they do get trounced this time around it will be more about the economy than immigration.
If they aren’t in danger, sure.
Sure I do.
So you say.
I am being far more civil than low info deserves.
Have I cursed you?
The first step to coming out of those bleachers is an admission.
What is the current problem with the illegals in the context of your narrative?
Apply
Applying is not working.
What’s the problem?
Calling me “low info” is not civil.
Have I cursed you?
Perhaps under your breath. I’ve never cursed you. Cursing someone and using curse words is not the same thing.
Of course it is. And accurate.
Yes you did. I quoted the post.
