The reply I have unfortunately come to expect from you. Ignoring the rest of the post I provided that obliterated your OP and continued denial of reality, I see?
The Trump connection isn’t the photo and quote. it’s Alex Acosta.
Go back and look at the coverage in the Miami Herald (a notorious GOP rag ) at the time that plea deal/coverup was exposed. No shortage of coverage there.
Hell, go back and look at the MSM coverage of Bill Clinton’s first campaign. Every liberal outfit on the block covered his “bimbo eruptions” just as breathlessly as they did Trump’s assault and harassment allegations in 2016. The only difference is that the GOP shills like Fox News and AMI killed the anti-Trump stories.
As usual, it is the very things the right is most guilty of that they most vocally accuse the left of doing. SMDH
“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with,” Trump said at the time. “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it: Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”
So? In your opinion what does that mean? In your opinion the President somehow new that this high powered democratic donor was buying and porking under aged girls? The President knew? Is that your claim?
My reply was to Cratic coming in with what he thought was a big ‘Gotcha’ post. My reply showed as much evidence that Trump knew about Epstein’s actions as Cratic’s post showed evidence that Clinton did.
And like a true trump supporter they just pretend it’s a huge success anyways. Many people have said this is the best thread they’ve ever read and it’s true, so true, and so needed.
What’s your point? Are you claiming that the President knew that this high powered democratic donor was a pedophile and said nothing? Unless this is the case, then there really is no point. Is there?