Doctors. I have seen three different doctors since turning 50. All three have recommended an initial colonoscopy in the 50s, with a 10-year interval thereafter IF no problems are found. Because when caught early, colon cancer is quite curable. If not, it is quite likely fatal. Polyps are not necessarily cancerous, but they can and often do become cancerous. If you are prone to polyps, you are prone to colon cancer. If polyps are not found during one colonoscopy, they still can develop later, thus the 10-year check. Its no big deal to have a colonoscopy, but it is a very big deal to have colon cancer.
A PSAT does not find pre-cancerous polyps; that finds your eligibility to enter college.
I think you mean PSA test ⊠which is an indicator of possible prostate cancer, not colon cancer.
The only non-invasive test for colon cancer that I am aware of is the test for blood in the feces. And that does not indicate cancer, it indicates bleeding which might possibly be due to cancer. Then they go in and look.
You mean none of those weapons jumped up off the table and âwent off?â Meanwhile 4,100 people were shot in Chicago in 2020. Yet the libs think you are the problem. They suck.
Just because I wear my seat belt doesnât mean Iâm afraid of getting in a car accident. Or, as previously mentioned if the day is cloudy and I carry an umbrella with me doesnât mean it is going to rain.
I suppose it is difficult for some to extrapolate the same logic/motivation in preventative healthcare to preventative home security.
I disagree with the last statement. The doctor punctured my dadâs colon during a colonoscopy. Thankfully they were able to repair it with stitches and not require more drastic measures. That was certainly a hell of a deal.