just a reminder…
the federal govt said this:
“We’re flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation“
just a reminder…
the federal govt said this:
“We’re flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation“
who defines what is and isn’t “problematic” and “disinformation”?
They better hurry up and stack the court cause that won’t fly.
the courts are left leaning enough as it is they’ll get to do what they want
until the next revolution
Over under on how long it is until, we are at war, no more critics for that either?
Or heck, due to danger of insurrection, no more criticizing the government period and no more of that bill of rights nonsense.
Or heck, due to danger of insurrection, no more criticizing the government period and no more of that bill of rights nonsense.
one step at a time…
zantax:Or heck, due to danger of insurrection, no more criticizing the government period and no more of that bill of rights nonsense.
one step at a time…
Time is running out, people are catching on.
thinkingman: zantax:Or heck, due to danger of insurrection, no more criticizing the government period and no more of that bill of rights nonsense.
one step at a time…
Time is running out, people are catching on.
people who give a damn yes. everyone else just hates America they want it to end
zantax: thinkingman: zantax:Or heck, due to danger of insurrection, no more criticizing the government period and no more of that bill of rights nonsense.
one step at a time…
Time is running out, people are catching on.
people who give a damn yes. everyone else just hates America they want it to end
They are outnumbered and poorly armed and dumb. Oh and hopelessly fractured and without a unified purpose.
fallenturtle: STODR: fallenturtle: Bill.in.PA:The US government is blatantly enforcing censorship and labeling opposing views as disinformation. That is what authoritarian governments do.
So our government was authoritarian under Trump because he kept calling things “fake news”?
Do you try to make stupid comparisons or do you just don’t understand the difference between calling something you think false and censoring something you think is false?
Well the US government isn’t enforcing censorship and so that leaves us with “labeling opposing views as disinformation”, something Trump and many administrations before him have engaged in.
So you were just making a stupid comparison, got it
In response to a stupid claim like, “The US government is blatantly enforcing censorship”.
OH and they are certanatly trying to do it by proxy.
“Surgeon General Vivek Murthy called on social media companies Thursday to curb misinformation related to the coronavirus pandemic and vaccines in his first health advisory since being confirmed to the position.”
Again, not government censorship.
fallenturtle: Bill.in.PA:Biden made the fine-people hoax the center of his campaign. Why was he never censored for spreading disinformation?
Because private companies get to decide what to censor or not censor.
based on their politics. right
you’re starting to catch on. i think.
I never questioned the idea that a private company can have a political bias… just absurd notion that the DNC is controlling them.
STODR: fallenturtle: STODR: fallenturtle: Bill.in.PA:The US government is blatantly enforcing censorship and labeling opposing views as disinformation. That is what authoritarian governments do.
So our government was authoritarian under Trump because he kept calling things “fake news”?
Do you try to make stupid comparisons or do you just don’t understand the difference between calling something you think false and censoring something you think is false?
Well the US government isn’t enforcing censorship and so that leaves us with “labeling opposing views as disinformation”, something Trump and many administrations before him have engaged in.
So you were just making a stupid comparison, got it
In response to a stupid claim like, “The US government is blatantly enforcing censorship”.
STODR:OH and they are certanatly trying to do it by proxy.
“Surgeon General Vivek Murthy called on social media companies Thursday to curb misinformation related to the coronavirus pandemic and vaccines in his first health advisory since being confirmed to the position.”
Again, not government censorship.
Tripe.
In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Norwood v. Harrison that the government “may not induce, encourage, or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”
Make sure you read the whole article, lots more precedent listed.
Yes, it makes much more sense for the companies to kiss up to the CIA.
If you doubt that, here is the letter that censored the Hunter Biden stories before the election:
thinkingman: fallenturtle: Bill.in.PA:Biden made the fine-people hoax the center of his campaign. Why was he never censored for spreading disinformation?
Because private companies get to decide what to censor or not censor.
based on their politics. right
you’re starting to catch on. i think.
I never questioned the idea that a private company can have a political bias… just absurd notion that the DNC is controlling them.
if not the DNC then the White House itself
either way this should trouble you
What other forms of social media “misinformation” will soon be barred by the DNC? Second amendment rights? Criticism of holy progressive organizations like BLM? Socialism or communism? Climate change tax scams? The state-approved language possibilities are now limitless, all thanks to the Democratic Party.
Oh you know, criticizing homosexuality, trans, apple pie, mom, chevrolet.
Oh you know, criticizing homosexuality, trans, apple pie, mom, chevrolet.
The flag, the anthem.
Banning profiles with the American flag is an obvious choice too.
why is it so important for some to get dis-information out to the public about covid and or vaccinations?
do we really need more “it makes you magnetic” nuttery spreading around?
If you can’t lie to your marks, is anyone truly free?