If you can show where I said anything incorrect by all means do so.
And be specific?
the speed at which a certain someone wanted desperately to prove that trump genius gut was right is amazing. if only they could google better.
This may mean Trump is actually reading something besides Twitter. That’s a step up if true.
i mean i doubt he read it and this editorial (not a study) makes one hell of an assumption that was conveniently left out.
What assumption is that exactly?
you do not see it?
You made the statement, support it.
And be specific?
An editorial by someone eminently qualified on the subject.
its supported by anyone reading the non-study editorial, compared to someone who want to label it as a study and…needs to google ■■■■■■■ better
So you have nothing. Thanks.
did you link to a study?
Oh geeze I used the wrong word, sue me. “article”.
editorial vs article vs study.
major difference in the 3 but as long as we can agreed that if you had slowed down and read the actual piece that is progress.
“read faster then you can think” paraphrased.
so now that you have read the piece do you see the assumption?
So you googled something, did not know the correct date or what it even was and rushed here to make a thread.
Classic WildRose
An editorial is an article. Seriously you are going to derail the thread with this ■■■■■
i am walking you step by step, inch by inch, because we have to as has been demosntrated 9872 times in the past where there ends up being egg on your posts.
now in this non-study…did you read it yet?
Trump
Was
Right!
Anything touched by humans is going to be flawed to one degree or another.