BTW it’s dated February 28
3 Likes
Also literally not what the Breitbart article says, let alone the NEJM article.
Ok I’m a week off.
Odd none of you brought this up while ranting about Trump this week.
It’s an editorial, and it has been discussed.
That’s exactly what the study says.
[T]he overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.
Wrong
I certainly haven’t seen it and I’ve been following the CV threads pretty closely, hence I started this one.
And this is what you said:
Gee it’s almost like Trump looks at Breitbart.
1 Like
This went well.
1 Like
If you can show where I said anything incorrect by all means do so.
And be specific?
2 Likes
the speed at which a certain someone wanted desperately to prove that trump genius gut was right is amazing. if only they could google better.
6 Likes
This may mean Trump is actually reading something besides Twitter. That’s a step up if true.
1 Like
i mean i doubt he read it and this editorial (not a study) makes one hell of an assumption that was conveniently left out.
1 Like
What assumption is that exactly?
you do not see it?
You made the statement, support it.
And be specific?
1 Like
An editorial by someone eminently qualified on the subject.
its supported by anyone reading the non-study editorial, compared to someone who want to label it as a study and…needs to google ■■■■■■■ better
