So you missed the word MOST.
thinkingman: Borgia_dude: thinkingman: Apocalypto: thinkingman: Apocalypto: thinkingman: Excast: Roxiebelle:Being a devout Christian (which I’m not) and believing in marriage is between a man and a woman (which I do) does not equate to intolerance of gays, or equate to considering gays being a negative on society.
The rest of us are a bit tired of being lectured about the sanctity of marriage by people who line up to vote for a man who serially cheats on spouses and brags about it.
is marriage sacred?
Nope. It’s a legal contract signed by two consenting individuals.
so is a civil union
It’s a legal contract signed by two consenting adults.
yes, so is a civil union. but that’s not good enough for the “everything is anything to everybody” left
Civil unions never promised all rights associated with marriage. Kind of a separate but unequal.
incorrect. sorry
So you missed the word MOST.
so you missed “all”
so you missed “all”
It can’t be both. And where did you obtain this definition anyways?
thinkingman:so you missed “all”
It can’t be both. And where did you obtain this definition anyways?
it’s not obvi that it’s from wiki?
“most or all” sounds pretty encompassing to me
“most or all” sounds pretty encompassing to me
You can be mostly something or all something. You can’t be both.
There is a simple solution to this.
Don’t like them.
Don’t eat there.
I have patronized them maybe four or five times in my life and the food seemed fine. Not KFC by a mile, but fine.
Kentucky … FRIED … Chicken
As for CFA, they cost too much and Whatburger is handy…
I had Chick fil-A a few times because of free sandwich offers. There’s a restaurant pretty close to where I live. It never impressed me. I see no reason to pay them to eat.
Popeyes had a temporary offer on chicken like Chick-fil-A…they sold out…better and cheaper than Chick-fil-A.
That’s nice.
Homosexual acts should have never been legalized. Even is enforcement was spotty those statutes protected us from the perverts and their allies running amuck … and that was good.
No. The baby morons got their way by throwing a hissy fit.
calirepub:I had Chick fil-A a few times because of free sandwich offers. There’s a restaurant pretty close to where I live. It never impressed me. I see no reason to pay them to eat.
Popeyes had a temporary offer on chicken like Chick-fil-A…they sold out…better and cheaper than Chick-fil-A.
A guy in Tennessee sued them for running out of chicken sandwiches!
Same thing being carried out in congress with this fake impeachment…if libs cry and throw a big hissy fit maybe…just maybe enough repugs will give in to em.
And why not? It’s not like they meaning repugs haven’t don so in the past.
That’s nice.
Homosexual acts should have never been legalized. Even is enforcement was spotty those statutes protected us from the perverts and their allies running amuck … and that was good.
Don’t like homosexual acts…don’t have homosexual sex yourself. Easy peasy.
Same thing being carried out in congress with this fake impeachment…if libs cry and throw a big hissy fit maybe…just maybe enough repugs will give in to em.
And why not? It’s not like they meaning repugs haven’t don so in the past.
How can something that has not happened yet be called “fake”?
mobulis: thinkingman: Borgia_dude: thinkingman: Apocalypto: thinkingman: Apocalypto: thinkingman: Excast: Roxiebelle:Being a devout Christian (which I’m not) and believing in marriage is between a man and a woman (which I do) does not equate to intolerance of gays, or equate to considering gays being a negative on society.
The rest of us are a bit tired of being lectured about the sanctity of marriage by people who line up to vote for a man who serially cheats on spouses and brags about it.
is marriage sacred?
Nope. It’s a legal contract signed by two consenting individuals.
so is a civil union
It’s a legal contract signed by two consenting adults.
yes, so is a civil union. but that’s not good enough for the “everything is anything to everybody” left
Civil unions never promised all rights associated with marriage. Kind of a separate but unequal.
incorrect. sorry
So you missed the word MOST.
so you missed “all”
Its either all or most, can’t be both.
I wish KFC had chicken nuggets. I go to Chuck Fil A mainly because they have better chicken nuggets than McDonald’s and because of their waffle fries. (Wendy’s is pretty good too, except after the incident with the finger being put into the food I kind of avoid it).
If anyone can tell me a place with GOOD chicken nuggets and waffle fries, I will happily bring my business to them.
Borgia_dude: thinkingman: Apocalypto: thinkingman: Apocalypto: thinkingman: Excast: Roxiebelle:Being a devout Christian (which I’m not) and believing in marriage is between a man and a woman (which I do) does not equate to intolerance of gays, or equate to considering gays being a negative on society.
The rest of us are a bit tired of being lectured about the sanctity of marriage by people who line up to vote for a man who serially cheats on spouses and brags about it.
is marriage sacred?
Nope. It’s a legal contract signed by two consenting individuals.
so is a civil union
It’s a legal contract signed by two consenting adults.
yes, so is a civil union. but that’s not good enough for the “everything is anything to everybody” left
Civil unions never promised all rights associated with marriage. Kind of a separate but unequal.
incorrect. sorry
Dude, you used a wiki entry for the term used around the world. How were Civil Unions treated in the US? My recollection is they did not automatically grant all the rights that marriages did. Further, they were not recognized across state lines like marriages are which is pretty important. Each state could decide on their own to recognize civil unions.
thinkingman:“most or all” sounds pretty encompassing to me
You can be mostly something or all something. You can’t be both.
yes i understand what “or” means
You’re right. People should really stop hating others for having opinions.
That is the entire basis for US politics - can’t get rid of that.
thinkingman: Borgia_dude: thinkingman: Apocalypto: thinkingman: Apocalypto: thinkingman: Excast: Roxiebelle:Being a devout Christian (which I’m not) and believing in marriage is between a man and a woman (which I do) does not equate to intolerance of gays, or equate to considering gays being a negative on society.
The rest of us are a bit tired of being lectured about the sanctity of marriage by people who line up to vote for a man who serially cheats on spouses and brags about it.
is marriage sacred?
Nope. It’s a legal contract signed by two consenting individuals.
so is a civil union
It’s a legal contract signed by two consenting adults.
yes, so is a civil union. but that’s not good enough for the “everything is anything to everybody” left
Civil unions never promised all rights associated with marriage. Kind of a separate but unequal.
incorrect. sorry
Dude, you used a wiki entry for the term used around the world. How were Civil Unions treated in the US? My recollection is they did not automatically grant all the rights that marriages did. Further, they were not recognized across state lines like marriages are which is pretty important. Each state could decide on their own to recognize civil unions.
my research shows they granted most “rights” that marriage (whatever that means nowadays) did
if not all
Don’t like homosexual acts…don’t have homosexual sex yourself. Easy peasy.
NO - when gays act gay they are forcing it down my throat and demanding I accept it as normal as straights acting straight! They’re flaunting it and using the gubmint to force me to bend over and accept their unnatural acts! I’m agin um!